Hoot said:
Perhaps it's the wording of the question?
Do any heterosexual women like political debate?
Yes the implications are quite clear and are subject to scientific observation.
Hoot said:
This isn't a logical question.
Forgive me my grand superior of logic. I didn't realize that you wrote the book on logic. Now that you mention it I do realize that you haven't the faintest idea of what the word means. Look it up.
Hoot said:
Of course some heterosexual women like political debate, and of course, some will not be interested, or simply don't have the time, or fail to see the point of expressing their opinions in forums like this?
I think it is more than clear that you are confusing the word "some" with "most".
Hoot said:
The only possible answer to the above question is 'yes.'
Really? So it's not possible to say no? The poll results show that you indeed are in denial. If it were not possible to say No then there would not be any person that said "no". Have you checked the results?
Hoot said:
Anyone who answered 'no' is lumping all hetero women into one group, a very dangerous, and yes, sexist thing to do.
In the previous statement you said it's impossible to say "no". Now you are saying it's possible only if you are sexist? Which one is it? You are contradicting yourself with each and every word you type... yet you criticize my logic? That's quite amusing and I appreciate your rhetoric. :rofl
Hoot said:
It's like asking...
Do any women like to go shopping?
In this context you are just as guilty as me insinuating that women like to argue by your so called standard. Again your words contradict your so called beliefs. You are not being sincere. Perhaps you are unwitting. Either way you are doing a fine job to illustrate your position on this thread.
For example if you didn't care, as you originally claimed, then perhaps you may have played more of a pacifist role here. But instead you take the time to respond not once, but twice, about something that you claim not to care about. Bravo.
Hoot said:
Yes, of course they do (like to go shopping), but I'm sure you could find some that don't care for the experience.
I already knew that the human race is non-linear in this aspect. You were trying to explain something here? Could you be any more redundant? Could you dodge the issue any than by offering such a redundant blanket statement while avoiding the fact of scientific observation.
Hoot said:
So, what's the point to a question like yours, Archon?
I've already stated my intentions and feel no need to repeat myself. I'm assuming that you can read however I do have concerns about your comprehension.
Hoot said:
Perhaps you should've worded your question like this....
Why aren't more women involved in political debate?
I've seen several women involved in political debate... most of them are leftist feminist who are more concerned about the prolifieration of homosexuality than anything else.
Hoot said:
Your use of the word "hetero' could lead one to believe there's a difference between homosexual and heteros regarding their like/dislike of debate...another dangerous assumption.
That exactly was my intention. To raise this exact question. There is nothing dangerous about it. It's a matter of semantics and cognition... not a matter of political correctness. In the female population there clearly is a clear distinction in terms of an activist role when comparing the hetero/homo population. Most homosexual women are very active in politics while most heterosexual women are not. It's a fact and I'm sure that a majority of persons that have studied political science and psychology could affirm that for you.
Hoot said:
I didn't know it was possible to determine genetalia over the internet? Can you be certain who you're debating with? Perhaps that 'ol tough Marine, GYSGT...is actually a 12 year old girl? ( No offense Sarge...just making a point) Sorry Archon, but I still say that's one of the dumbest polls I've ever seen, and I still say it's a sexist question. If you don't realize this, it says more about you then it does me...no hard feelings, though.
You're not making a point here you're being imperious and cynical when indeed such impulsive psychosis is not warranted. No hard feelings? Not on my part anyway....