- Joined
- Jul 9, 2008
- Messages
- 30,277
- Reaction score
- 17,796
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Whoa there. The standards are chosen for the larger group, those who wish exemption from those standards for some condition beyond their control shouldn't be talking fairness when given said exemption. Everyone has a bad day now and again, some folks have lots of them - should there be a bad day exemption? Everyone is different where it comes to mental acuity and it exists in a large range. Should we get more time on a test because we're not at the top of that range? How far do you want to take that?
You're giving me false equivalences. While I sympathize with someone being blue one day, that is not a disability. While I agree everyone is different, it is not a disability. While I like to try to aspire to join you neurotypical folks in your modest homes, competitive employment, what you describe is not a disability. While I appreciate being able to educate folks on what it is like to have a disability, I can speak for many of us when I say we do not like being equated to cheaters, the lazy, and the inefficient.
Languages other than my native tongue are sweat inducing and near impossible for me, should I be graded on the standards everyone else must meet for passing German language 101 or graded solely upon my effort?
No, but if you were in the court of law and you spoke a different language, they would require that you be allowed to hear the court in the language in which you read or speak, right? Same thing here.
It's not about you or the general population. In these matters, the rest of the student body and the American public can bugger off. They mean absolutely nothing, nor should their concerns be given any weight whatsoever.