- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,397
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
With the greatest respect, if an apple is rotten to the core, you don't eat the apple, you pick a fruit that's completely different!
If both parties leaders are proven just figureheads, the system must change! Obama before being elected as president, said the secret prisons like Guantanamo would be closed if elected, when elected, he tried to keep his promise, the military refused! It's still going strong!
Both parties are increasing budgets for war, and both parties are excluding any investigation into war crimes.
But, there are only two apples, there are no other pieces of fruit in the basket, and therefore the metaphor doesn't wash, moreover, because you can't fix a rotten piece of fruit, but you can fix a party, if you work hard and long enough. If there are only choices, that is the only viable path to take
And, I don't accept your premise, that the DNC is 'rotten to the core'. Wasserman/Clinton are out. If you have evidence on Perez, provide it. Additionally, the DNC is not the democratic party, as a whole, it consists of it's members, people like me and the vast majority of us are good persons with smart ideas about policy. You're characterization feels reactionary, emotional, not based on reality. I really think you should reassess your position.
As for Guantanamo, it wasn't the military who wouldn't allow him to close, for how could they? He is the Commander-In-Chief. But, in truth, it was Congress that disallowed it, which Obama fought, but didn't win on the matter of closure. Now, how did congress achieve this? They snuck in a provision in a larger defense bill that Obama had to sign ( or the political price would have been too high had he not signed it ) that made it impossible to use funds to close the base. I accept that he had pressure from the military to keep it open owing to it's strategic location. So you characterization isn't quite right.