Madacapa said:I read this article on the Wall Street Journal web site. I copied the title of the article for this title. Here is the link:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007415
What I read assured me that the Bush Administration is a neo-theocracy. He had his "hit-man" Karl Rove call this cabal of 13 to let them know that Miers was one of them. Isn't anyone out there bothered by this? Do the citizens of the Red States want a theocracy? Miers will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade, before she has seen the case. Stop voting for right wing idiots like Bush. STOP IT!
aquapub said:She unequivocally has anti-abortion views (+). She is pro-business, which means she is anti-labor union (+), and pro-free enterprise (+). She didn't go to an elite school like Harvard (+), which means she likely got something vaguely resembling an objective (instead of left-wing) education.
aquapub said:And, as far as her qualifications go, around 40% of all Supreme Court justices have been lawyers with no judicial experience. (All a judge is is a promoted lawyer).
The only down side to this woman that I can see with the available information is that she managed to have these views and still contribute to the campaign of such a stooge like Al Gore.
Madacapa said:Thomas Jefferson assued us in that letter that there was a separation of church and state in the constitution. The Bush Administration does not see it that way. They need to get the approval of this religious cabal of 13 organizations before announcing to everyone else their Supreme Court nominee. Apparently the Religious Right wants the USA to model itself after Iran. They have a president, but he answers to the religious leaders of that country. That is what the Religious Right wants in this country.
aquapub said:She unequivocally has anti-abortion views (+). She is pro-business, which means she is anti-labor union (+), and pro-free enterprise (+). She didn't go to an elite school like Harvard (+), which means she likely got something vaguely resembling an objective (instead of left-wing) education.
The only down side to this woman that I can see with the available information is that she managed to have these views and still contribute to the campaign of such a stooge like Al Gore.
And, as far as her qualifications go, around 40% of all Supreme Court justices have been lawyers with no judicial experience. (All a judge is is a promoted lawyer).
Navy Pride said:I believe that contribution was yo ALgore in 1988 when he was still pro life and relatively conservative until he did a 180 and turned liberal in 2000 to placate his left wing base........
There were very few Republicans in power in Texas in 1988 and a lot of the democrats in power were conservative ao that explains why she allied with them.....
Listening to the left you would think that it would be a disqualifier for her because she is pro life........
I am very excited about her nomination and think she will be confirmed easily and that should be the first step in overturning the murderous law that kills innocent, defenseless babies in the womb and reverts the abortion issue back to the states where it belongs..........
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?