• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DHS begs for volunteers to rush to the border, admits surge of migrants is 'overwhelming'

Robertinfremont

Photo of me taken in the Army 1963
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2018
Messages
30,122
Reaction score
3,395
Location
Meridian, Idaho
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
Well when Biden opened our border doors (actually no doors, just open border) it had to happen.

Now the befuddled Biden has to get help to keep out the crowd he invited in.

What have they begged for? Volunteers to correct the Biden misteps.

This one term mistake sure knows how to mess up our system.


biden_mexico_16628_c0-187-4637-2890_s885x516.jpg
 
The rag site doesn't even link to what it's talking about, but from the cherry-picked quotes it is not asking for anyone to work for free, just for 900 existing employees to work there rather than wherever the are now, temporarily. It also bears mentioning that these are asylum seekers. Many Trumpists seem to have "forgotten" that we've always welcomed a fair number of lawful asylum seekers.

All the links in the article go to this page:

______________



You've got to hand it to the brazen dishonesty of Trumpism. Despite claiming to only be concerned about illegals, the Trump GOP targeted and reduced all legal means of arriving here, too, for example crashing lawful entry on asylum from about 70k/year to about 15k/year. Of course you're going to see a return when Biden undoes stuff like the fight against people arriving here lawfully. We'd just artificially slashed the amount of lawful asylum seekers admitted, because some people are terrified of whites becoming a minority by population.

But you have to wonder what kind of person looks at this situation and thinks "damn, we better resume ripping children from parents and deporting the parents without tracking them, to make sure nobody else seeks asylum". . . .



If we want to do something about this, we need to cut off the reason for anyone to come here unlawfully: availability of employment. Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays. We're never going to completely eliminate illegal immigration, but you'd certainly make a large dent by getting rid of one main incentive.

That would do way more than walls and hopelessly cruel/evil policies like Trump's child separation (and no, contrary to Trumpist lies, Biden is not resuming that)
 
The rag site doesn't even link to what it's talking about, but from the cherry-picked quotes it is not asking for anyone to work for free, just for 900 existing employees to work there rather than wherever the are now, temporarily. It also bears mentioning that these are asylum seekers. Many Trumpists seem to have "forgotten" that we've always welcomed a fair number of lawful asylum seekers.

All the links in the article go to this page:

______________



You've got to hand it to the brazen dishonesty of Trumpism. Despite claiming to only be concerned about illegals, the Trump GOP targeted and reduced all legal means of arriving here, too, for example crashing lawful entry on asylum from about 70k/year to about 15k/year. Of course you're going to see a return when Biden undoes stuff like the fight against people arriving here lawfully. We'd just artificially slashed the amount of lawful asylum seekers admitted, because some people are terrified of whites becoming a minority by population.

But you have to wonder what kind of person looks at this situation and thinks "damn, we better resume ripping children from parents and deporting the parents without tracking them, to make sure nobody else seeks asylum". . . .



If we want to do something about this, we need to cut off the reason for anyone to come here unlawfully: availability of employment. Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays. We're never going to completely eliminate illegal immigration, but you'd certainly make a large dent by getting rid of one main incentive.

That would do way more than walls and hopelessly cruel/evil policies like Trump's child separation (and no, contrary to Trumpist lies, Biden is not resuming that)
Let me know when any Dems (or Reps, for that matter) in Congress do something about "Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays."

Until then, our borders are open.
 
The headline is misleading.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas begged Monday for volunteers from agencies within his department to rush to the border to help with an “overwhelming” surge of illegal immigrants.

The way that rag wrote the headline, we're gonna have every gap-tooth boog West of the Rockies down here trying to play Gestapo.
 
Relax, Stephen Miller and Kirstjen Nielsen are on the way.
 
Talk about a big fat WHOOSH...

Let me know when any Dems (or Reps, for that matter) in Congress do something <>

So what are you always doing attacking Democrats specifically if I'm correct that neither is doing it, but that it is what would actually need to be done to do something meaningful?

So what were you always doing praising Trump for wanting a Great Wall of Derp even though he couldn't get funding from his own party for that and even though it wouldn't do anything (as illegals amply demonstrated, cutting through portions of fence he'd rebuilt...)?





<>
Until then, our borders are open.

Well, no. Not open either. Just not as closed as it should be.

I have at least been consistent with this refrain. I've probably posted some version of it at least thirty times over the years. Neither is doing what might actually work - though at least the Dems were onboard with multiple bills providing mixed border security (that the GOP snubbed) - so the bulk of the right's attacks on the left about immigration are massively hypocritical and contemptible.

You don't get to attack Democrats on immigration if you praise useless GOP policies like a great wall of derp.
 
Talk about a big fat WHOOSH...



So what are you always doing attacking Democrats specifically if I'm correct that neither is doing it, but that it is what would actually need to be done to do something meaningful?

So what were you always doing praising Trump for wanting a Great Wall of Derp even though he couldn't get funding from his own party for that and even though it wouldn't do anything (as illegals amply demonstrated, cutting through portions of fence he'd rebuilt...)?







Well, no. Not open either. Just not as closed as it should be.

I have at least been consistent with this refrain. I've probably posted some version of it at least thirty times over the years. Neither is doing what might actually work - though at least the Dems were onboard with multiple bills providing mixed border security (that the GOP snubbed) - so the bulk of the right's attacks on the left about immigration are massively hypocritical and contemptible.

You don't get to attack Democrats on immigration if you praise useless GOP policies like a great wall of derp.
I attack both the Dem and Rep Elites. You should know that by now, don't you think?
 
The rag site doesn't even link to what it's talking about, but from the cherry-picked quotes it is not asking for anyone to work for free, just for 900 existing employees to work there rather than wherever the are now, temporarily. It also bears mentioning that these are asylum seekers. Many Trumpists seem to have "forgotten" that we've always welcomed a fair number of lawful asylum seekers.

All the links in the article go to this page:

______________



You've got to hand it to the brazen dishonesty of Trumpism. Despite claiming to only be concerned about illegals, the Trump GOP targeted and reduced all legal means of arriving here, too, for example crashing lawful entry on asylum from about 70k/year to about 15k/year. Of course you're going to see a return when Biden undoes stuff like the fight against people arriving here lawfully. We'd just artificially slashed the amount of lawful asylum seekers admitted, because some people are terrified of whites becoming a minority by population.

But you have to wonder what kind of person looks at this situation and thinks "damn, we better resume ripping children from parents and deporting the parents without tracking them, to make sure nobody else seeks asylum". . . .



If we want to do something about this, we need to cut off the reason for anyone to come here unlawfully: availability of employment. Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays. We're never going to completely eliminate illegal immigration, but you'd certainly make a large dent by getting rid of one main incentive.

That would do way more than walls and hopelessly cruel/evil policies like Trump's child separation (and no, contrary to Trumpist lies, Biden is not resuming that)
Agreed. But they are actually having a surge of illegals entering, 100,000 in February. Information about how things are being done at the border is so contradictory and confusing that I'm not sure, but it seems all those coming in without claiming asylum are causing a problem. They're apparently still being detained?

Maybe President Biden should have thought this through more and had the resources to make those changes in place before hurriedly erasing T****'s policies. T**** did the same thing and we damned him for it.

 
Well when Biden opened our border doors (actually no doors, just open border) it had to happen.

Now the befuddled Biden has to get help to keep out the crowd he invited in.

What have they begged for? Volunteers to correct the Biden misteps.

This one term mistake sure knows how to mess up our system.


biden_mexico_16628_c0-187-4637-2890_s885x516.jpg
I wouldn't go help. Let them choke on their bad policy. #AbolishICE
 
The rag site doesn't even link to what it's talking about, but from the cherry-picked quotes it is not asking for anyone to work for free, just for 900 existing employees to work there rather than wherever the are now, temporarily. It also bears mentioning that these are asylum seekers. Many Trumpists seem to have "forgotten" that we've always welcomed a fair number of lawful asylum seekers.

All the links in the article go to this page:

______________



You've got to hand it to the brazen dishonesty of Trumpism. Despite claiming to only be concerned about illegals, the Trump GOP targeted and reduced all legal means of arriving here, too, for example crashing lawful entry on asylum from about 70k/year to about 15k/year. Of course you're going to see a return when Biden undoes stuff like the fight against people arriving here lawfully. We'd just artificially slashed the amount of lawful asylum seekers admitted, because some people are terrified of whites becoming a minority by population.

But you have to wonder what kind of person looks at this situation and thinks "damn, we better resume ripping children from parents and deporting the parents without tracking them, to make sure nobody else seeks asylum". . . .



If we want to do something about this, we need to cut off the reason for anyone to come here unlawfully: availability of employment. Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays. We're never going to completely eliminate illegal immigration, but you'd certainly make a large dent by getting rid of one main incentive.

That would do way more than walls and hopelessly cruel/evil policies like Trump's child separation (and no, contrary to Trumpist lies, Biden is not resuming that)
This is the lefts opportunity to show the country how much better their ideas are. E-Verify and putting up smart fences and whatever else they say is gonna control the crisis at the border. Put up or shut up.
 
The rag site doesn't even link to what it's talking about, but from the cherry-picked quotes it is not asking for anyone to work for free, just for 900 existing employees to work there rather than wherever the are now, temporarily. It also bears mentioning that these are asylum seekers. Many Trumpists seem to have "forgotten" that we've always welcomed a fair number of lawful asylum seekers.

All the links in the article go to this page:

______________



You've got to hand it to the brazen dishonesty of Trumpism. Despite claiming to only be concerned about illegals, the Trump GOP targeted and reduced all legal means of arriving here, too, for example crashing lawful entry on asylum from about 70k/year to about 15k/year. Of course you're going to see a return when Biden undoes stuff like the fight against people arriving here lawfully. We'd just artificially slashed the amount of lawful asylum seekers admitted, because some people are terrified of whites becoming a minority by population.

But you have to wonder what kind of person looks at this situation and thinks "damn, we better resume ripping children from parents and deporting the parents without tracking them, to make sure nobody else seeks asylum". . . .



If we want to do something about this, we need to cut off the reason for anyone to come here unlawfully: availability of employment. Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays. We're never going to completely eliminate illegal immigration, but you'd certainly make a large dent by getting rid of one main incentive.

That would do way more than walls and hopelessly cruel/evil policies like Trump's child separation (and no, contrary to Trumpist lies, Biden is not resuming that)
You are aware it is not Trump with the problem he created, but Biden?
 
Let me know when any Dems (or Reps, for that matter) in Congress do something about "Ramped up national e-verify, ramped up enforcement against employers of illegals with penalties for employing them so great they cannot be considered a cost of business. Better monitoring/check-ins of visa holders to reduce overstays."

Until then, our borders are open.
Democrats prefer to punish the firm for hiring them than to stop them from arriving with a welcome Biden shirt on.
 
You are aware it is not Trump with the problem he created, but Biden?

Reread everything before the comma until you see your self-own. Yes, Biden is wrestling with the problem that Trump created. And he's doing it in a way that isn't as evil as Trump.

Why do you praise evil?
 
Democrats prefer to punish the firm for hiring them than to stop them from arriving with a welcome Biden shirt on.
No. Dems don't even want to punish the firms for hiring them. They welcome the illegals in with open arms and ignore the laws that punish firms for hiring them.
 
No. He isn't.

Billionaire (he claims, possibly lying) asshole who benefits massively from upper crust tax cut scheme that benefits real estate turds the very most isn't a "GOP elite"?

They're all lining up to rim him. He's more elite than Reagan at this point. He's ****ing GOP royalty.


LOL
 
You are aware it is not Trump with the problem he created, but Biden?

This surge is smaller than the one during the Trump administration. Did Trump create that one?
 
No. He isn't.

Is that why he didn't release his tax returns? Because he's not an elite, just an average working Joe who pays his taxes?
 
Billionaire (he claims, possibly lying) asshole who benefits massively from upper crust tax cut scheme that benefits real estate turds the very most isn't a "GOP elite"?

They're all lining up to rim him. He's more elite than Reagan at this point. He's ****ing GOP royalty.


LOL
Being wealthy isn't what defines being an Elite.
 
Is that why he didn't release his tax returns? Because he's not an elite, just an average working Joe who pays his taxes?
Being wealthy isn't what defines being an Elite.
 
Democrats prefer to punish the firm for hiring them than to stop them from arriving with a welcome Biden shirt on.
/sarcasm on
Rumor is it was Trump who had the Welcome T-shirts made up and passed out to the people in Mexico.
/ Sarcasm off

It seems one side (D) does want to go after the businesses that hire illegals. Republicans tend to favor e-verify, which is a form of going after businesses, is it not?

I don't disagree that we need stop stop illegal crossings.
 
Being wealthy isn't what defines being an Elite.

Being wealthy and having control of a party does not define being Elite?

Do you not realize how tangled your lies have become or do you just not care because you have to say the things you say?
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwf
/sarcasm on
Rumor is it was Trump who had the Welcome T-shirts made up and passed out to the people in Mexico.
/ Sarcasm off

It seems one side (D) does want to go after the businesses that hire illegals. Republicans tend to favor e-verify, which is a form of going after businesses, is it not?

I don't disagree that we need stop stop illegal crossings.
When you get into the mood, go study the actual E verify law and regulations It is not like you think it is.

Sure alert them to show up for Jobs then get them removed from those Jobs because the top firms use e verify but the small guys do not have to use it.
 
Is that why he didn't release his tax returns? Because he's not an elite, just an average working Joe who pays his taxes?

How you like having strangers study your IRS returns? The IRS has all of them and has a CID group that arrests cheats. If Trump was a cheater, he would be locked up in jail waiting trial.
 
Back
Top Bottom