- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Messages
- 34,969
- Reaction score
- 15,027
- Location
- Springfield MO
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Big Brother in action, Surely this can’t pass Constitutional muster.
Would/could this be considered extortion?
Very true. "Stop listening to news!" "You want evidence? Here's a partisan blog!" "Believe what the government tells you!" "Our politicians don't lie!" "Don't Audit! Don't ask questions!" "Don't survey to see if there's a problem!"It really sounds like many these posters have never been to college.
Maybe you should take a class somewhere?It was a long time ago, buddy.
Maybe you should take a class somewhere?
There are many good community colleges in this country.
I agree with Hillary. It wasn't done on the level. We know that now, but trump won "fairly". As in no votes where changed.A page taken from the leftist playbook...
Hillary Clinton Maintains 2016 Election ‘Was Not On the Level’: ‘We Still Don’t Know What Really Happened’
Hillary Clinton is sticking with her conviction that the 2016 presidential election was not conducted legitimately, saying the details surrounding her loss are still unclear."There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level," Clinton said during an interview...news.yahoo.com
BREAKING: Stacey Abrams maintains claim that the 2018 election was ‘stolen’
“It was stolen from the voters of Georgia,”Abrams said, we do not know what they would have done because not every eligible Georgian was permitted to participate fully in the election.”thepostmillennial.com
Was the 2004 Election Stolen?: A Debate on Ohio One Year After Bush’s Victory
A year later, questions remain over the outcome of the Ohio election and whether George W. Bush fairly won the state and the presidency. We explore some of these questions with a debate between Mark Crispin Miller and Mark Hertsgaard. [includes rush transcript]www.democracynow.org
Electronic Voting: The Stolen Election of 2004
Using a variety of criminal methods that they have perfected over the past four years, the George W. Bush-Dick Cheney-Karl Rove syndicate stole another election, and extended their illegal occupation of the White House. (Mentions peak oil.)www.resilience.org
Of course I need not post anything about the "stolen" 2000 election...
Where are you pulling these numbers from, besides your ass?
So here I am at a small private school (SMU) in the very early 90's.I am misinformed?
Can you share some of this "wealth" of evidence?
Do you have actual experiences from college you could share?
Well let me correct it then; there are many good community colleges in my area. I don’t know where you’re at in the world.Not really.
So the government needs to redistribute equity to conservatives with college professor?A survey in the mid '00s:
- Sent to 2958 professors, with a response rate of 51%, or 1,471 professors responding; (p. 23)
-- more non-responders were conservatives (speculation as to why, p.23-24)- of those, study is restricted to full-time professors, 1,417 (p. 23)
- Self-description of politics was. (p26):
View attachment 67339526
- Distribution amongst fields of the above @ p28
What's Grandpappy running with? 255 professors, in social sciences (which is where courses on Marxism and the like are clustered), across America. (p.40-41).
256 professors
They were asked how much they feel themselves described on a seven point scale, and the study-makers decided 18.1% of them answered in a way that qualifies as "Marxist". And 18.1% of 1417 is ... 256
And those 256 are clustered in an area that typically includes courses on Marxism and the like.
Always remind me of Ralph wigam.." I'm an expert"Maybe you should take a class somewhere?
There are many good community colleges in this country.
So, mandating teaching about “the evils of communism“ isn’t stifling speech?Why would you continue to fund institutions where speech is stifled and counter opinions are not allowed? I don't want my tax dollars going to these types of institutions.
So, mandating teaching about “the evils of communism“ isn’t stifling speech?
It clearly is that they are going down the road of the Soviet Union and China, where there was official doctrine of legitimate dogma and everything else was banned.
Mandating that something be taught as evil is stifling speech and the government can’t do that. It will be struck down by the courts. The Robert’s Court seems to have an absolutist view on free speech.You've got your laws mixed. Plus, saying something is evil isn't stifling anything.
You've got your laws mixed. Plus, saying something is evil isn't stifling anything.
Salon.com lies it's ass off!New law will survey Florida students, professors on political views
Colleges could lose funding if survey of "ideas and perspectives" fails to satisfy state's GOP-run legislaturewww.salon.com
So basically there a few things with this one.
DeSantis is using the arm of government to try to control colleges. Now he didn't say what the end result would be but they would be involved.
If you read further down we have barney bishop a lobbies for this bill saying he would like to see this further towards k through 12 because kids are being indoctrinated I guess and not being taught Christian values.
You know who else does this shit? The taliban.
Smaller government was a marketing strategy and nothing more
Salon.com lies it's ass off!
Read the bill. It's about demanding assessments of how colleges are allowing diversity of opinions and not shutting out one side in favor of another.
No because students can and do lie and there is absolutely no penalty that can be given from this sort of survey for lying. They also could exaggerate.The state could institute budget cuts whenever it wants, new law or not. Don't be dumb.
The law requires universities to conduct a survey of whether the students and faculty believe that competing ideas are being presented, and whether students and staff feel free to express their beliefs and viewpoints. If the survey comes back indicating that students and staff DON'T believe that competing ideas are being presented, or that they are being punished for expressing their beliefs and viewpoints, don't you think that's something that should be corrected?
Evil is subjective so a university teaching that something is "evil" particularly a political or economic system is in fact stifling free speech about those political/economic philosophies, even if most people think that those philosophies are wrong or not good.You've got your laws mixed. Plus, saying something is evil isn't stifling anything.
These bills are nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to push conservative ideology.Salon.com lies it's ass off!
Read the bill. It's about demanding assessments of how colleges are allowing diversity of opinions and not shutting out one side in favor of another.
Communism is evil. Look at China's history under communism.These bills are nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to push conservative ideology.
Desantis is nothing but a hypocrite. He claims to want intellectual diversity, but he simultaneously demands that children be taught "communism is evil".
You're allowed to have an opinion. But you can't advocate for the suppression of opposing political views, while also claiming to want "intellectual diversity". Those are mutually exclusive goals.Communism is evil. Look at China's history under communism.