• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DeSantis bullied kids to take off their masks

And they continue to lie like hell, most recent example is a law that protects the youngest students from inappropriate materials being falsely and baselessly called 'Don't say gay', which it does not state in the law.
The only folks who are lying in that regard are the folks who don't put the "Don't Say Gay" part in quotes in other words are indicating they either believe those words are part of the Bill or they just don't realize it isn't.

So there is that.
 
The only folks who are lying in that regard are the folks who don't put the "Don't Say Gay" part in quotes in other words are indicating they either believe those words are part of the Bill or they just don't realize it isn't.

So there is that.
Please justify why teachers should be discussing issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger.
It's fair enough to call it what it appears to be, namely 'grooming'.

Please justify what teachers should be discuss issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger rather than those children's parents.

Suffice it to say that it's the left distorting, twisting, the truth of what the bill is to generate needless and baseless fauxrage over a non-issue.
 
Please justify why teachers should be discussing issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger.
It's fair enough to call it what it appears to be, namely 'grooming'.

Please justify what teachers should be discuss issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger rather than those children's parents.

Suffice it to say that it's the left distorting, twisting, the truth of what the bill is to generate needless and baseless fauxrage over a non-issue.
Teacher's are talking about sex with 5-year olds? Where is that happening?
 
Please justify why teachers should be discussing issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger.
It's fair enough to call it what it appears to be, namely 'grooming'.

Please justify what teachers should be discuss issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger rather than those children's parents.

Suffice it to say that it's the left distorting, twisting, the truth of what the bill is to generate needless and baseless fauxrage over a non-issue.
I have nothing to justify.

But thanks for thinking of me!
 
Please justify why teachers should be discussing issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger.
It's fair enough to call it what it appears to be, namely 'grooming'.

Please justify what teachers should be discuss issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger rather than those children's parents.

Suffice it to say that it's the left distorting, twisting, the truth of what the bill is to generate needless and baseless fauxrage over a non-issue.
Please justify a law that prohibits what isn’t happening.
 
I asked first, and I rather doubt that you can justify it if you even will attempt to do so.

Please justify a law that prohibits what isn’t happening.
None the less:
It is happening. Teachers are injecting themselves into this conversation and those topics with children, without parental notification, nor approval, behind the backs of parents.

Jan 24, 2022A California mother filed a suit against two teachers and the school district for a policy did not tell parents if their child decided to change their gender identities.​

THREAD: 2 teachers at a California school reportedly coached a 12 year old into a trans identity behind her parents back. The school also changed her name and pronouns without informing the parents.​

Tony Perkins / @tperkins / February 24, 2020. The California Teachers Association added "transgender and binary youth" to the students who can leave class for medical reasons without their parents ...​

WI school district says parents 'not entitled' to know child's sexuality, pushes 'heterosexual privilege' list District's push for 'gender-nonconforming' accommodations has irked parents and educators​

Why are teachers and their unions so intent in inserting themselves where they have no right to insert themselves?
 
I asked first, and I rather doubt that you can justify it if you even will attempt to do so.


None the less:
It is happening. Teachers are injecting themselves into this conversation and those topics with children, without parental notification, nor approval, behind the backs of parents.

Jan 24, 2022A California mother filed a suit against two teachers and the school district for a policy did not tell parents if their child decided to change their gender identities.​

THREAD: 2 teachers at a California school reportedly coached a 12 year old into a trans identity behind her parents back. The school also changed her name and pronouns without informing the parents.​

Tony Perkins / @tperkins / February 24, 2020. The California Teachers Association added "transgender and binary youth" to the students who can leave class for medical reasons without their parents ...​

WI school district says parents 'not entitled' to know child's sexuality, pushes 'heterosexual privilege' list District's push for 'gender-nonconforming' accommodations has irked parents and educators​

Why are teachers and their unions so intent in inserting themselves where they have no right to insert themselves?
Sort of like Trump.
 
Please justify why teachers should be discussing issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger.
It's fair enough to call it what it appears to be, namely 'grooming'.

Please justify what teachers should be discuss issues related to sex with children who are 5 years or younger rather than those children's parents.

Suffice it to say that it's the left distorting, twisting, the truth of what the bill is to generate needless and baseless fauxrage over a non-issue.
Can you justify the gaslighting here and by other conservatives? Since the bill doesn't just ban things related to sex. In fact, it doesn't ban talking about sex itself. It bans talking about sexual orientation and/or gender issues, which aren't about sex (as in sexual intercourse) when talked about 90% of the time. And teachers are more than capable and have been keeping these discussions age appropriate for a very long time. The problem is conservatives who themselves cannot separate sexuality or even gender issues from sex. To conservatives, those things are about sex so they are unable to understand that others don't feel their need to sexualize everything like that.
 
Can you justify the gaslighting here and by other conservatives? Since the bill doesn't just ban things related to sex. In fact, it doesn't ban talking about sex itself. It bans talking about sexual orientation and/or gender issues, which aren't about sex (as in sexual intercourse) when talked about 90% of the time.
'sexual orientation and/or gender issues' discussions are more so the child's parent's domain, rather than teachers.
So still no justification for teachers having these discussions with child age 8 or under? No surprise. It is rather unjustifiable in any circumstance.
What business is it of teachers to inject themselves into these types of discussions with children of that young age range? Still no justification for this?

And teachers are more than capable and have been keeping these discussions age appropriate for a very long time.
This is parent vs. teacher control of parent's children issue more than anything else. For these topics it isn't the business of teachers to discuss them, or indoctrinate the children.

The problem is conservatives who themselves cannot separate sexuality or even gender issues from sex. To conservatives, those things are about sex so they are unable to understand that others don't feel their need to sexualize everything like that.
The problem with liberals is their drive for the state to supersede parents in the raising of those parent's children. What better way to create 'Little Revolutionaries'?

An apparently pro-Antifa teacher in California bragged about turning his students into far-left "revolutionaries," according to a new video released by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas.​
The 12-minute video purports to show Inderkum High School teacher Gabriel Gipe talking about his involvement with the Antifa Sacramento chapter and how he gives students extra credit for attending protests.​
"I have 180 days to turn them into revolutionaries…scare the f--k out of them," the man said in the video.​
"I post a calendar every week," he said. "I’ve had students show up for protests, community events, tabling, food distribution, all sorts of things. … When they go, they take pictures, they write up a reflection – that’s their extra credit."​


More and more stories like this appearing in the media.

It is also quite clear that the parents of these children don't what their children exposed to this at the ages where the teachers are doing, and have already done.
 
'sexual orientation and/or gender issues' discussions are more so the child's parent's domain, rather than teachers.
So still no justification for teachers having these discussions with child age 8 or under? No surprise. It is rather unjustifiable in any circumstance.
What business is it of teachers to inject themselves into these types of discussions with children of that young age range? Still no justification for this?


This is parent vs. teacher control of parent's children issue more than anything else. For these topics it isn't the business of teachers to discuss them, or indoctrinate the children.


The problem with liberals is their drive for the state to supersede parents in the raising of those parent's children. What better way to create 'Little Revolutionaries'?

An apparently pro-Antifa teacher in California bragged about turning his students into far-left "revolutionaries," according to a new video released by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas.​
The 12-minute video purports to show Inderkum High School teacher Gabriel Gipe talking about his involvement with the Antifa Sacramento chapter and how he gives students extra credit for attending protests.​
"I have 180 days to turn them into revolutionaries…scare the f--k out of them," the man said in the video.​
"I post a calendar every week," he said. "I’ve had students show up for protests, community events, tabling, food distribution, all sorts of things. … When they go, they take pictures, they write up a reflection – that’s their extra credit."​


More and more stories like this appearing in the media.

It is also quite clear that the parents of these children don't what their children exposed to this at the ages where the teachers are doing, and have already done.
It isn't parents vs teachers. It is a select group of parents who don't like anyone talking about homosexuality or gender issues around their children. Instead of doing what should be done, homeschooling or sending their children to private school, they think they should be able to say what teachers cannot talk about at all. That is not right.

Project Veritas is a lying bunch.
 
Back
Top Bottom