• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Depleted uranium

python416

Active member
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
484
Reaction score
2
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Here is a topic that doesn't get much coverage, because it is on the list of no-win topics that is to be avoided by incumbant military and governement officials.

http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2005/09/28/65337

[not a news article, but an opinion page link]

What do military service men and women think about DU usage?
Is there anyone out there who really thinks this is safe stuff?
If there are any people who think it is safe, are any of them familar with the physics behind the safety concerns?
How come "supporting the troops" does not include DU contamination concerns?
 
Top Bottom