• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dems Would Be 'Justified' in Blocking Supreme Court Nominee of GOP President

mak5 said:
They've done it before, why not?
Click to expand...

Sure, why not? Both parties can just keep pointing fingers at the other and accomplish nothing.

It's been that way for quite some time now.
 
Dittohead not! said:
Sure, why not? Both parties can just keep pointing fingers at the other and accomplish nothing.

It's been that way for quite some time now.
Click to expand...

Has the word 'unprecedented' lost any and all meaning?

The republicans are not giving merrick Garland a senate hearing.

Even Robert Bork got a hearing when he was a nominee.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
Has the word 'unprecedented' lost any and all meaning?

The republicans are not giving merrick Garland a senate hearing.

Even Robert Bork got a hearing when he was a nominee.
Click to expand...


Well, it's been that way since the election of '08 at any rate. I'm not sure whether the current Congress' childish partisan gamesmanship has ever been so bad before that time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom