Dems will try for fast track amnesty. Will they succeed? (1 Viewer)

[Rogue]

The career Democrats from gerrymandered districts who will hold office for life, said Sunday that they are going to try to push a fast track amnesty bill through Congress, shortly after the 100 hours period. They say that the midterm election victorys give them a mandate. I'm hoping that they won't be successful. It would be one of the worst things that could happen to this country.

 

[Morty]

A 'mandate'??
I believe the Republicans, the ones who proposed this country-killing idea, just got booted and lost ground in many traditional conservative areas. How is that not a mandate for doing the exact opposite?!

 

[Rogue]

A 'mandate'??
I believe the Republicans, the ones who proposed this country-killing idea, just got booted and lost ground in many traditional conservative areas. How is that not a mandate for doing the exact opposite?!

Could you say this in a more clear way so I sure I understand just what you're saying?

Harry Reid did make a statement to the effect that since the Democrats got about 69% of the Latino vote in the midterm, they feel that they have a mandate to go ahead with an amnesty bill. The Dems and the liberal media are going low key on this issue because it is so devisive. The Dems will get around to amnesty soon after their 100 hours.

 

[Captain America]

Mandate? Political capitol? Where have I heard this before?

:rofl

Ain't karmha a *****?

 

[Morty]

Could you say this in a more clear way so I sure I understand just what you're saying?

Weren't the Republicans the first ones to propose amnesty? I thought I remember Bush leading the charge on that one.

If so, then the Democrats have a mandate for doing the exact opposite, being as the Republicans got booted.

 

[Rogue]

Weren't the Republicans the first ones to propose amnesty? I thought I remember Bush leading the charge on that one.

If so, then the Democrats have a mandate for doing the exact opposite, being as the Republicans got booted.

The Democrats have been pandering for the Latino vote for as long as I can remember. Bush has said that he is not going to concede all the Latino votes to the Democrats and has clearly been doing pandering of his own. The problem is that for every Latino vote that Bush has gotten, he has lost two conservative votes. Besides, doesn't Bush realize that you just cannot out pander a Democratic politician.

Most analysts say that people voted against Bush much more than they voted for the Democrats. That means there really wasn't much of a mandate for anyone.

 

[jamesrage]

The career Democrats from gerrymandered districts who will hold office for life, said Sunday that they are going to try to push a fast track amnesty bill through Congress, shortly after the 100 hours period. They say that the midterm election victorys give them a mandate. I'm hoping that they won't be successful. It would be one of the worst things that could happen to this country.

I hope there are plenty of slightly conservative democrats and pro-sovereignty liberal democrats in office to tell Bush to shove his amnesty plan up his ***.

 

[Rogue]

I hope there are plenty of slightly conservative democrats and pro-sovereignty liberal democrats in office to tell Bush to shove his amnesty plan up his ***.

Tancredo is saying that he will do everything he can to stop an amnesty, but he thinks there is a 50-50 chance that there WILL be an amnesty.

 

[Holden Caulfield]

I hope there are plenty of slightly conservative democrats and pro-sovereignty liberal democrats in office to tell Bush to shove his amnesty plan up his ***.

It's all political. Im sure there are plenty but do you honestly think that these Dems, especially in a state like California, would give up their stronghold on latino voters? They had to play some serious soft-ball to gain that demographic.

 

[jamesrage]

It's all political. Im sure there are plenty but do you honestly think that these Democrats, especially in a state like California, would give up their stronghold on latino voters? They had to play some serious soft-ball to gain that demographic.

California is liberal land even their republican governor is a liberal.IN many states democrats have not succumbed to the mental illness know as liberalism.

Conservative Democrats seek larger role - Politics - MSNBC.com
Republicans "did not lose their seats to liberal Democrats" in last weeks elections, said Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark. "Republicans lost their seats to Blue Dog Democrats."

 

[Rogue]

It's all political. Im sure there are plenty but do you honestly think that these Democrats, especially in a state like California, would give up their stronghold on latino voters? They had to play some serious soft-ball to gain that demographic.

Mexifornia, as California will increasingly be referred to as, with it's 1 out of every 3 Latino population, is probably already lost to the Reconquista. The pandering career Democratic politicians have mostly made this possible. They all are salivating at the thought of gaining the majority of this vast new voter block commonly known as illegal aliens. And there is Jorge Bush, who is willing to sign amnesty legislation which will obviously create millions more new Democratic voters that Republican. He apparently is willing to sell the Republican party down the tubes. Is it all for his secret agenda of a North American Union?

Jorge is the single man most responsible for the illegal alien tsunami that has occurred and is still occurring under his administration.

 

[Holden Caulfield]

i grew up in California in a wine business/viticulture family and i can tell you first hand that its all about money. the majority of our agriculture/labor work force is made up of illegal immigrants who dont come to this country to be Americans and assimilate, they come to make money that they can send back to their families in Mexico. but if we deported every illegal, we would have to hire legal citizens to work those jobs and would have to pay them minimum wage, document them, and of course, they would unionize. who wants to do that when you can pay people $4/hour under the table?

should we sacrifice our culture for monetary gain?

and even then its killing our economy becuase we shell out millions of dollars in social services to people who dont even pay back into the system through taxes (which also devistates real US citizens who need these services) and the money they make is all sent out of country rather than being recirculated.

 

[Rogue]

i grew up in California in a wine business/viticulture family and i can tell you first hand that its all about money. the majority of our agriculture/labor work force is made up of illegal immigrants who dont come to this country to be Americans and assimilate, they come to make money that they can send back to their families in Mexico. but if we deported every illegal, we would have to hire legal citizens to work those jobs and would have to pay them minimum wage, document them, and of course, they would unionize. who wants to do that when you can pay people $4/hour under the table?

Nancy Pelosi is doing just this in her vineyards and chain of restaurants in sanctuary San Francisco. It doesn't get much higher profile than that.

should we sacrifice our culture for monetary gain?

The majority of liberals and the paid spammers on these forums are trying to tell us that multiculturalism is a GOOD thing.

and even then its killing our economy becuase we shell out millions of dollars in social services to people who dont even pay back into the system through taxes (which also devistates real US citizens who need these services) and the money they make is all sent out of country rather than being recirculated.

All true.