• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Demonstrating and picketing outside Federal Judges homes. Illegal?

So every time the opponents of Roe were protesting around the Supreme Court, they were breaking the law?

That doesn't sound right.
 
The vapidity of "legal" discussion on DP kills me.


You should probably find at least one circuit court decision rejecting an argument that the evidence was insufficient to convict under that statute in circumstances just like this and thus affirming convictions.

You didn't because you were just stealing from:

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.
www.foxnews.com
 
locking up protestors.

are we living the USSR or Berlin?
 
It's almost like the protesters are denying The Right to Privacy.....lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…