no, he's the person i use to throw it back in the faces of people who claim he barely lost, when according to his own standards, he lost by a landslide.So Trump is your standard for accurately characterizing election results?
What do you mean by tough reporting? Because liberal media outlets have certainly been tough on Republicans, but it didn't make them any less of an embarrassment. I think in general conservative media outlets are just as soft on Republicans as liberal media outlets are on Democrats. Neither Democrat or Republican voters are having their ideas challenged by the media outlets they watch, and that is definitely not a good thing.
It'll be on those that would vote for him, not his detractors. We already know they would vote for him even if he is in prison during the next election. That'll show the libs!
I'm pretty sure I have.
www.npr.org
Your point is your opinion. Noted.
Actually, that's 100% true. The DNC forced Hillary through. If it had been Bernie vs Donald, we would have had 4 years of Sanders.
In 2015, his criminal activities were personal and pretty private. Today they are not.
Why can't the GOP come up with a better candidate then?
Did you think that before Biden was elected too? How did that work for ya? Trump lied and you bought it hook line and sinker because it’s hard to admit trump lost and you were wrong?
After he explains all his indictments and law suits. I doubt he'll have much time for anything but defending himself.
Agreed. I have asked that a bunch of times. Compared to Trump, Sarah Palin would have been a better choice.
Chuckle.
Of course he is. There is no way an unconventional candidate like Trump would have won if the Democrats weren't so far out of touch with reality and people weren't disgusted with politicians in general.,
And yet he lost the popular vote twice. Try again. Maybe take a deep look at what the GOP and its voters really are.
Yeah, Donald Trump didn't appeal to the darkest part of the Republican party.
I won't defend registered Republicans who are bad. Bad people in the Democratic Party found Hillary appealing too or they wouldn't have voted for her.
Read this list carefully and remember that Trump's total statistics are not yet added to the list. They're still piling up.
The list is spot on. A google search will reveal these results. Don't look so good for republicans. The party of crime.
I agreed with you that it doesn't look good with Republican leaders vs Democratic leaders but I bet you are wrong about voters. Look at a national map that breaks down red counties, blue counties, NOT red states, blue states. The county map looks like a population density map, with Democrats in cities and Republicans in the country. Aren't crime rates much higher in cities?
Would you not consider OAN, Newsmax or Breitbart true conservative media outlets? And I'm not disagreeing that Democrats don't have a lot media oversight, but my point was that Republicans don't really have that either, at least none that conservatives pay any attention to. Yes, plenty of liberal media outlets are very critical of Republicans, but those aren't the media outlets conservatives are watching. They're watching Fox, OAN or whatever, and they're giving Republican politicians a free pass just like CNN, MSNBC, etc are giving Democratic politicians a free pass. Maybe if the media was more critical of their own both parties would be in a better state. Or perhaps viewers should just choose their media outlets more wisely or watch both sides to get a more balanced perspective.
www.bbc.com