• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats to levy fines on maskless lawmakers on House floor

Interesting judgment, considering the hateful garbage said about Melania Trump on here for the last 4 years.

The existence of serial killers doesn't justify your behavior.
 

House Democrats on Tuesday will adopt new rules slapping fines on any lawmakers who refuse to wear masks on the chamber floor.
The new guidelines will hit offending lawmakers with a $500 fine on the first offense and $2,500 on the second, to be deducted from the lawmakers' pay, according to a senior Democratic aide.

The rules will be adopted Tuesday evening as part of the rule governing a Democratic proposal designed to at removing President Trump by way of the 25th Amendment.
===========================================
If the repubs don't like it, they can quit. Please.

Actually all they will do is pay the fine and charge it off to "campaign expenses".
 
I agree with her but I am not sure if anyone can lower the pay of any Congress Critter. I think its in the constittution..

The person's gross pay is NOT "lowered", it's just that there would be "deductions" from their gross pay just as there are deductions for income tax and other statutory levies.
 
I agree with her but I am not sure if anyone can lower the pay of any Congress Critter. I think its in the constittution..
Pay remains the same. Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2.
 
In November 2022 no one will even remember it happened. The liberal outrage media will have invented at least ten more phony stories by then.
Okay, now January 6th is fake news too. Pound sand.
 
There's nothing in there that said their pay can't be garnished to pay fines and debts.
Pay remains the same. Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2.
 
Pay remains the same. Article 1, Section 5, Clause 2.
under garnishment - there should be language added, that indicate their pay is subject to garnishment be it to recover debt, whether it tax, child support or what every they choose to list as being within the guidelines of garnishment
 
under garnishment - there should be language added, that indicate their pay is subject to garnishment be it to recover debt, whether it tax, child support or what every they choose to list as being within the guidelines of garnishment
Garnishment is allowed. They are not above the law.
 
Not after 2022 when the Democratic Party gets drubbed at the midterms.
Nope, not happening, especially since the GOP is going to be fractured in half. Maybe the real conservative republicans can start their own party and try to wash off the stains left behind by the republican party.
 
under garnishment - there should be language added, that indicate their pay is subject to garnishment be it to recover debt, whether it tax, child support or what every they choose to list as being within the guidelines of garnishment

Unless there is specific legislative provision otherwise, the pay for a Senator or Representative is as liable for attachment as is the pay of the Senator's or Representative's secretary.

This is what is known as "equality under the law" - possibly you have heard of it.
 
Nutty Nancy should wear a mask all the time. It'll make less people nauseated.

Why is it that only women's appearance in Congress attacked but never men? Some of those guys are not exactly GQ material.
 
Why is it that only women's appearance in Congress attacked but never men? Some of those guys are not exactly GQ material.

Because the easiest thing to criticize about a competent woman in public life is their appearance (nobody really cares what a competent man looks like) and the easiest thing to criticize about an incompetent person is their lack of competence (nobody really cares what an incompetent person looks like).

That means that (other than in the "World of Fashion") when you see someone criticizing the appearance of a woman in public life, that is a good clue to the fact that the woman is actually competent AND that the person doing the criticizing knows it (but won't admit it because that would be a blow to their own self-assessed competence).
 
Back
Top Bottom