- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 106,664
- Reaction score
- 98,573
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Okay. She a loser.
Compelling argument. Her job is to marshal votes and raise financing. When has she been bad at that?
Okay. She a loser.
Certainly not her alone but she is part of the problem. "Impeachment is off the table?"--Pelosi on GW Bush. What leader defangs her own party?!
Compelling argument. Her job is to marshal votes and raise financing. When has she been bad at that?
Compelling argument. Her job is to marshal votes and raise financing. When has she been bad at that?
The reason for the Democrats' loss was moving their centers of power from local communities to DC. I don't know whose decision that was.
I didn't pay attention to politics much in that period, what did she do?
Certainly not her alone but she is part of the problem. "Impeachment is off the table?"--Pelosi on GW Bush. What leader defangs her own party?!
By the way, its more than a little telling that some Democrats don't like Pelosi, but can't even suggest an alternative.
By the way, its more than a little telling that some Democrats don't like Pelosi, but can't even suggest an alternative.
This is the angsty left at its worst. Showboating is not what matters. Getting policies passed that raise people’s wages, improve their access to health care, make education more accessible, etc are what matters. That’s what Pelosi does.
The years 2006 to 2012. Her theatrics with Schumer allowed for Democrats to lose 60+ seats and guided us to the mess we have today. One where Democrats are trying to keep control of a single body of government just to have a chance in 2020.
Some--not all, but some--progressives are the Left's version of the Party Of No.
I think dems are pretty unified in general. But comparing one dem to another, Bernie is more socialist then Pelosi, while Bernie is more about grass root campaign and lower income bracket building while Pelosi is more globalist and well entrenched in wall st and corporations.
This is the angsty left at its worst. Showboating is not what matters. Getting policies passed that raise people’s wages, improve their access to health care, make education more accessible, etc are what matters. That’s what Pelosi does.
Except, puzzlingly, the “no” here is to advancing progressive policies.
Was Obama in office in 2006?That's BS. The loss was because of the now wildly popular AHC act and a black man in the Whitehouse.
Cardinal answered the question to some extent, I'm more angry at the fact she tried to claim she'd get most of her agenda passed in the first 100 hours, when we know her voting strategy has always been to vote first, and ask questions later. That did more damage to Democrats than anything Obama has ever said or done.
Cardinal answered the question to some extent, I'm more angry at the fact she tried to claim she'd get most of her agenda passed in the first 100 hours, when we know her voting strategy has always been to vote first, and ask questions later. That did more damage to Democrats than anything Obama has ever said or done.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Call it the chaos theory for picking the next House speaker.
Those Democrats trying to stop California Rep. Nancy Pelosi from reclaiming the job say they don’t need a rival candidate just yet. Instead, they plan to show that Pelosi lacks the votes to win the race. And then, they say, new challengers will emerge.
https://apnews.com/0c0bd89a74104d89aa1ebc35fc93a3cc
Good. I can't stand Pelosi. She's a do nothing loser like Hillary Clinton. A conservative.
That's true, what I'm looking for in a speaker is somebody who can bridge the corporatist and progressive wings of the party. I don't like the corporatism whatsoever but we have no choice right now and it's a first step to transitioning to something better. Pelosi does seem to be somewhat progressive so I like her in that respect.
The job of the Speaker is not to make money. You're making my argument.
Because Pelosi has already stated she will attack anyone proposing a challenge.
Lmao - she voted for something she hadn't read, and you think this inspires confidence from people my age who want politicians that do more than vote for the same reason I am expected to do more than sign on a dotted line? Yeah, okay you've deluded yourself into believing I care that people didn't like the AHCA and then they did. My problem is that the Democrat leadership under Pelosi proved so inept that they proudly admitted to not reading what they voted for. That alone makes her unfit to lead Democrats. Time to move on, let someone who can spend time reading what they vote for take over.Except she was so right about the AHC act. It DID need to get passed before people realized how much they would like it. That must really burn you up.