• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable (1 Viewer)

Cold Dirt

Cold Dirt

Banned
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
370
Reaction score
18
Location
GA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable
By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER



Iran with nuclear weapons is unacceptable, new House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer told The Jerusalem Post hours after entering the party leadership position.

The Maryland Democrat said the view is shared by his party, rejecting assertions that the Democrats would be weaker than the Republicans on Iran.

He also said that the use of force against Teheran remained an option.

Hoyer, second only in the hierarchy of the House of Representatives to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is charged with articulating and strategizing on party policy.

He spoke to the Post on Thursday, the opening day of the 110th Congress, after making an appearance at the National Jewish Democratic Council reception honoring the six new Jewish members of Congress.
Click to expand...

Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable | Jerusalem Post

Bunch of warmongers/chickenhawks.

You democrats are the devil........where have I heard this before?....hmmmmmm..............
 
What is their plan to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons?
 
Stinger said:
So will Pelosi's kids and grandkids be required to join the miltary? Will the left demand it as they have of the Bush twins?
Click to expand...
Although all of them will read your post, none of them will reply. Chickenhawks, indeed.
 
Unnacceptable, or the democrat appeasers will do what exactly ?
neville-chamberlain.jpg
 
Goobieman said:
What is their plan to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons?
Click to expand...

Whatever is necessary, including preemptive nuclear strikes, will be done. Iran is a terrorist state and they are not allowed to have nuclear weapons because they would send those weapons to Hizb'allah and then there would be massive genocide committed in the name of Allah.

No, it's better to wipe Iran out before they get the chance to do this. When Iran is not run by a shiite scumbag and there is a REAL government there ... then there will be room for negotiations... otherwise... no toys for them.


:mrgreen:
 
Vader said:
Whatever is necessary, including preemptive nuclear strikes, will be done. Iran is a terrorist state and they are not allowed to have nuclear weapons because they would send those weapons to Hizb'allah and then there would be massive genocide committed in the name of Allah.
Click to expand...
While I agree with this statement, I don't -really- think you mean to say that the Dems in congress will consider, much less advocate, 'whatever is necessary, including preemptive nuclear strikes'. Those weords will never, ever come from their mouths.
 
Pre-emptive nuclear strikes..... Jesus I need a drink. Red wine it is then.
 
GarzaUK said:
Pre-emptive nuclear strikes..... Jesus I need a drink. Red wine it is then.
Click to expand...
Like the democrats would have the balls.....I really dont believe either side has the balls anymore to use nukes unless one is used against America first.....thank the liberals for that........
 
Cold Dirt said:
Like the democrats would have the balls.....I really dont believe either side has the balls anymore to use nukes unless one is used against America first.....thank the liberals for that........
Click to expand...

Just like Iraq, they talk big before the fact and then cower when something finally has to be done.
 
I find this all amusing, the Democrats havnt been in power for 12 years (Bill Clinton was basically hindered in his presidency from 1994 onwards) and they are not even a week into power. And already the foundations of Congress are crumbling. Two words. Drama Queen.
 
Cold Dirt said:
Democrats: Nuclear Iran unacceptable | Jerusalem Post

Bunch of warmongers/chickenhawks.

You democrats are the devil........where have I heard this before?....hmmmmmm..............
Click to expand...

1) Democrats have gotten us into nearly 100% of the wars we've been in over the last 100 years. Yet we are the war mongers. Thank you for ridiculing their historically oblivious smears.

2) The big question is what will Democrats do about Iran?

Between their claim that 15 years of failed multi-lateral diplomacy wasn't enough to justify forcibly removing Iraq's genocidal terror-sponsor and their claim that Bush is to blame for North Korea resuming it's nuclear program (which happened under Democrats before Bush took office) by using that dastardly multi-lateral diplomacy...

...there is no discernable princible on which their actions are based.


My guess is that they will do what they did the last time America was dumb enough to trust them with national security decisions (Al Queda)...They will talk tough, and then decide against killing the enemy at every turn (creating more terrorists), while making policies that make it nearly impossible for us to defend ourselves.
 
Cold Dirt said:
Like the democrats would have the balls.....I really dont believe either side has the balls anymore to use nukes unless one is used against America first.....thank the liberals for that........
Click to expand...


No, thank God for that!
 
Quote
(Whatever is necessary, including preemptive nuclear strikes, will be done. Iran is a terrorist state and they are not allowed to have nuclear weapons because)

Just who is going to use the preemptive Nuclear strike?

(they would send those weapons to Hizb'allah and then there would be massive genocide committed in the name of Allah. )

What absolute tosh.
Have you the remotest idea as to how close Lebanon (Hezbollah) is adjacent to Israel.
Thought not.
The idea may well be to obliterate Israel, but they have no intention of commiting suicide as well.

Quote

(No, it's better to wipe Iran out before they get the chance to do this. When Iran is not run by a shiite scumbag and there is a REAL government there ... then there will be room for negotiations... otherwise... no toys for them.)

Iran already has a Government that was elected under a democratic system.

I will however concede that Ahmadinejad is a SCUMBAG, and yes he follows the Shiite sect of Islam.
 
So will Pelosi's kids and grandkids be required to join the miltary? Will the left demand it as they have of the Bush twins?
Click to expand...
Yes, lets hope all progeny of politicians regardless of party sign up to join and that old jovial excuse of "I'm over 32" isn't going to cut it anymore; they added 8 more years to that or was it ten? Any Pro-War Dp'ers who didn't serve and are under 40? No excuse to join up--less it's just all talk.
 
Navy Seal Patriot said:
Yes, lets hope all progeny of politicians regardless of party sign up to join and that old jovial excuse of "I'm over 32" isn't going to cut it anymore; they added 8 more years to that or was it ten? Any Pro-War Dp'ers who didn't serve and are under 40? No excuse to join up--less it's just all talk.
Click to expand...

That's the position the left takes.
 
Ah, it's so nice to see how the "party of national security" really feels about appearing unified to the enemy when the other side is in power. Apparently, appearing fractured to the Iranians is cool now, and scoring political points is now more important than international security. Every time I ever heard that the democrats were giving aid and comfort to the enemy had clearly been disingenuous the whole time.
 
Adrian said:
Ah, it's so nice to see how the "party of national security" really feels about appearing unified to the enemy when the other side is in power. Apparently, appearing fractured to the Iranians is cool now, and scoring political points is now more important than international security. Every time I ever heard that the democrats were giving aid and comfort to the enemy had clearly been disingenuous the whole time.
Click to expand...

Newsflash: When this country is trying to win a war and Democrats call terror cells to let them know the FBI is coming, needlessly expose the inner-workings of classified anti-terror programs, and relentlessly communicate to the enemy that we are divided on fighting them, THAT IS giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

But when Republicans resist the left's treasonously spineless fixation on forcing defeat on this country, THAT IS NOT giving aid to the enemy. That would be trying to kill the enemy, genius.

Remove head from rectum, then debate. ;)
 
aquapub said:
Newsflash: When this country is trying to win a war and Democrats call terror cells to let them know the FBI is coming, needlessly expose the inner-workings of classified anti-terror programs,
Click to expand...

Pure paranoid schizophrenia.

aquapub said:
and relentlessly communicate to the enemy that we are divided on fighting them, THAT IS giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Click to expand...

More paranoid schizophrenia. No democrat has ever been against fighting terrorism. Try again.

aquapub said:
But when Republicans resist the left's treasonously spineless fixation on forcing defeat on this country, THAT IS NOT giving aid to the enemy. That would be trying to kill the enemy, genius.
Click to expand...

And guess what? You have met the enemy and become him. At least the democrats were sincere in their opposition to the Iraq war (or at least its execution), and sincere that opposition to a bad policy was simply part of free speech in a democracy. However, by your participation in this thread, you have shown that all those times that you declared that we must present a unified front to the enemy were bullshit all along. You have retroactively made a liar out of yourself.

Secondly, by mocking the democrats for a decision you would agree with, you have shown yourself to be guilty of the very worst sort of partisan hackery. You've put your hatred for democrats ahead of national security...by your own standards.
 
Adrian said:
by your participation in this thread, you have shown that all those times that you declared that we must present a unified front to the enemy were bullshit all along.
Click to expand...

A unified front only matters if it's unified in fighting the enemy. Liberals are making sure we lose this war. Not presenting a unified front for failure doesn't contradict our concerns over liberals dividing our front that was aimed at winning.

I can't believe you are still trying to sell this retarded point. :lol:
 
Adrian said:
At least the democrats were sincere in their opposition to the Iraq war (or at least its execution), and sincere that opposition to a bad policy was simply part of free speech in a democracy.
Click to expand...


Democrats were never sincere. Their repeated contradictions prove that. And maybe once you've been paying attention long enough to realize Democrats find an excuse to oppose America defending itself in EVERY situation, you might be more accurate about what liberals stand for. ;)
 
aquapub said:
Democrats were never sincere. Their repeated contradictions prove that. And maybe once you've been paying attention long enough to realize Democrats find an excuse to oppose America defending itself in EVERY situation, you might be more accurate about what liberals stand for. ;)
Click to expand...

In EVERY situation, huh? Like saying that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable? The least you could done is give the Democrats a back handed compliment, for example, "Well it's ABOUT TIME the Democrats came on board," but no, you had to find a way to sling mud at them for doing something you agree with. You're a partisan hack to the extreme who cares less about our national security than bad mouthing Democrats. You certainly don't care right now about presenting a unified front against a real threat. You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom