I understand completely how this works, as I had said, you did change your post.
No, you said I changed my post AFTER you posted. You were 100% wrong about that, especially since I wasn't even home. Seriously, try honesty. It works well.
Within the parameter of time that the last edited prompt didn't show up. You've admitted this inadvertently as well.
I never denied I edited my post, I was just accurately pointing out how wrong you were when you said I edited after you posted. Seriously, pay attention.
Now, yes it is a given. You ask 999 out of a 1000 and they'll fall my way.
:lol:
No they wouldn't.
Yes I can give a for instance I already did for a previous poster, Trent Lott. And what he said wasn't even close to what this guy said.
Trent Lott wasn't a state senator, try again.
Please, I can always tell when someone doesn't like being called to task for something they did, they like to throw out non sequiturs
And what did I do? Accurately point out how proud you were of using a word longer than six letters?
lest you'd have asked for clarification.
I didn't need clarification, your absurdity was quite clear.
Good, glad your laughing just remember we are all laughing too and not with you but at you...
The constantly proven wrong child whose proud of using a word longer than 6 letters claims to be laughing at me as I laugh at him. Somehow, that just doesn't bother me all that much.
I see your still throwing those gotcha's out there...:lamo
ABC NBC CBS CNN FOX MSNBC
Ahh, so YOU get to decide what media counts. And apparently Fox is now liberal media, who knew? And clearly Huffington Post doesn't count as liberal media and Yahoo and USA Today don't have nearly the presence in media as MSNBC.
Seriously, just stop. Even I am becoming embarrassed for you.
An apology would be unacceptable to liberals, so it is unacceptable to us. He should resign and lose all his benefits.
Yes, because that's what always happens when a politician on the right wing says something inappropriate. :roll:
The persecution complex of the right never ceases to amaze me.
If one can demonstrate the same history of long usage as in the Deen situation, clearly The Food Network should fire this guy from his cooking show.
:lol:
The sad part is I bet he has no idea what you just said. I do, though, and I approve.
So the public should be more concerned about what a dizzy cook on food network says, then someone who votes the laws of the land.
If you do not understand the difference between a private company and publicly elected job, then I really don't know what to tell you.
When I read posts like this, I have come to realize how intellectually dishonest one has to be if they are to be a party line partisan.
Funnily enough, I thought the same reading your post.
A private business can fire an individual if they desire, especially if that individual can bring a poor reputation and they can fire that person regardless of what the general public thinks of the person or what they said. A publicly elected official, for the most part, cannot just be immediately fired, they have to be voted out.
If you do not understand this difference, that's completely on you.
It makes you wonder what his justification for using "Uncle Thomas" was if he was unaware of any racial connotations.
I don't believe for a second it was innocuous, but his name really is Thomas. And it's not uncommon (at least where I live) to put "uncle" before someone's name when ridiculing them like this.
Again, I don't believe his explanation, but it could be justified.