A world government is nessary for us"New World Order" is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy.
If some countries in the global community don't want to play along e.g., China, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam etc..), then there cannot be a New World Order.
Also, not all members of the U.N. are democracies. Some are republics, some are Monarchies, some are communist, some are dictatorships. It would be unfair to ram democracy down their throats.
Would it be fair if the People's Republic of China petitioned the U.N. to spread Communism? Of course not.
Let democracy take root wherever it can. But the U.N. should not coerce other countries to be democratic.
United Countries of the World. We have to get to a place where weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a single authority and their use is voted on by the UN countries."New World Order" is a pie-in-the-sky fantasy.
If some countries in the global community don't want to play along e.g., China, North Korea, Russia, Vietnam etc..), then there cannot be a New World Order.
Also, not all members of the U.N. are democracies. Some are republics, some are Monarchies, some are communist, some are dictatorships. It would be unfair to ram democracy down their throats.
Would it be fair if the People's Republic of China petitioned the U.N. to spread Communism? Of course not.
Let democracy take root wherever it can. But the U.N. should not coerce other countries to become democratic. The U.N. needs to make ALL countries feel welcome at the U.N. assembly. This is what best promotes world peace.
The "UN" needs to dissolve and disappear back to the slime from which it came. It is an utterly worthless shell of pointlessness.I think we should encourage this progress. The UN needs to support Democracy.
Government has been evolving in to a single world government since the first troop moved into a cave. Do you read history?The "UN" needs to dissolve and disappear back to the slime from which it came. It is an utterly worthless shell of pointlessness.
There is no such thing as a "New Humane World Order." Such language is that of the dictator and totalitarian and not remotely "democratic."
I have already explained that this is not possible.A world government is nessary for us
United Countries of the World. We have to get to a place where weapons of mass destruction are controlled by a single authority and their use is voted on by the UN countries.
Little steps. The Ukraine war is just one.I have already explained that this is not possible.
Some countries that have WMDs are not interested in being controlled by a single authority. They wish to assert their sovereignty, and independence.
Sorry - - it's just the way it is. A "New World Order" is a fantasy.
Don't you think the UN vote to expel Russia from the Human Rights Conference is a beginning?I would love it if the democratic countries of the world had each other's back.
YepDon't you think the UN vote to expel Russia from the Human Rights Conference is a beginning?
Sure...a "new humane world order"...as long as you toe the line established by that new world order. (Whom ever controls the world order will establish that line, you know.) The Globalists, right now, are in the lead on controlling the order.I think we should encourage this progress. The UN needs to support Democracy.
A world government is nessary for us
That is why it is a United Countries of the World. It is democracy with a Constitution with a well defined separation between countries and the union.Currently there are about 190 governments in the world and most of them are positively awful.
What if your one world government turns out to be totalitarian?
That is just plain garbage - and "history" - if it proves anything, proves entirely the opposite.Government has been evolving in to a single world government since the first troop moved into a cave. Do you read history?
smhDon't you think the UN vote to expel Russia from the Human Rights Conference is a beginning?
Currently there are about 190 governments in the world and most of them are positively awful.
What if your one world government turns out to be totalitarian?
You don't think the United States works?Google "UN 21/2030 Agenda".
They're working on destroying sovereign nations and creating the security-police-state utopia you liberals desire.
"What if..?"Currently there are about 190 governments in the world and most of them are positively awful.
What if your one world government turns out to be totalitarian?
Like the United States?"What if..?"
By the very definition it would be totalitarian.
What in the world is your problem?Like the United States?
The United Countries of the World? (With a constitution.) Why not? Do you like a democratic republican government?What in the world is your problem?
No, not "like the United States." Good grief - you think we're the totalitarian one world order?
A "United Countries of the World" would, by definition, be a totalitarian government. That you don't see that is - frankly - a little scary.The United Countries of the World? (With a constitution.) Why not? Do you like a democratic republican government?