• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deficit-swelling Trump White House plans to use deficit against Democrats

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
111,740
Reaction score
101,971
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Deficit-swelling Trump White House plans to use deficit against Democrats




The White House plan is to slash every program and leave military funding the same. However, the military budget would actually be increased due to White House plans to raid the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, which no previous administration has ever before raided, and then add these pilfered funds to the Pentagon base budget.

As always with Republicans, they spend like mad dogs while in office, and then demand drastic spending cuts from succeeding Democrat administrations when they are the minority party. This is also the Trump/GOP recipe.

Related: Overseas Contingency Operations: The Pentagon Slush Fund
 
Needless to say, this is hypocrisy at its best. What Trump and his cult don't understand or want to understand that even if one cut foreign aid to zero, that only saves $45 billion, mostly from credits to buy American products. Same thing with cutting NPR and Big Bird, there really isn't much savings there. The big ticket items are only in five areas: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Defense and interest on the debt.

Many Trump voters benefit from Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and likely wouldn't want those cut.

The Dems are going to resist any GOP effort to cut social programs, and they'll look like heros to America. Pelosi will skillfully out maneuver Trump once again.
 
Maybe you two should just relax. Dems control the House. All spending bills originate there. The budget should be balanced this year.
 
This begs the question:

"What happens when a contingency occurs?"

Just sayin' ...
 
I'm wondering if Trump was maneuvering to get ahead of the coming debt ceiling battle with Congress. Some hypothesize Pelosi could use the fight starve Trump's fav campaign promises.
 
Maybe you two should just relax. Dems control the House. All spending bills originate there. The budget should be balanced this year.

It won't be.

1. The Dems will use funding bills as weapons...again.

2. They are too busy campaigning for the 2020 election...on the taxpayer's dime.
 
It won't be.

1. The Dems will use funding bills as weapons...again.

2. They are too busy campaigning for the 2020 election...on the taxpayer's dime.

And these distinguish them from republicans how?
 
And these distinguish them from republicans how?

Republicans don't control the House.

Your whataboutism is dismissed.
 
This begs the question:

"What happens when a contingency occurs?"

Just sayin' ...

Trump wants to wrap up US efforts in Syria and Afghanistan not because this would represent sound tactical/strategic thinking, but because Trump is looking at the $ bottom line.
 
The more funding Trump can pump into the Pentagon prior to 2020, the more he can claim to be America's great protector.
 
Republicans don't control the House.

Your whataboutism is dismissed.

Sorry you misunderstood. The question was more generic. Politics as usual, practiced by both sides when in similar positions.
 
I'm wondering if Trump was maneuvering to get ahead of the coming debt ceiling battle with Congress. Some hypothesize Pelosi could use the fight starve Trump's fav campaign promises.

And risk defaulting on our debt and harming our credit?
 
Trump wants to wrap up US efforts in Syria and Afghanistan not because this would represent sound tactical/strategic thinking, but because Trump is looking at the $ bottom line.

Those wars should be wrapped up.
 
Sorry you misunderstood. The question was more generic. Politics as usual, practiced by both sides when in similar positions.

I didn't misunderstand. I rejected your whataboutism.

I'm not interested in your "generic" irrelevance. We are talking about the Dems.
 



This is brilliant strategy and he will be successful implementing it.

Mark my words, he will successfully make his deficit appear the fault of the Democrats and win votes by so doing.

This is what he is good at, very good at. Mass manipulation.
 
And risk defaulting on our debt and harming our credit?
Politics, it would seem. But like I stated, it was a pundit's hypothesis (that seemed possible).
 
Funny thing is that not a single number cited is real - your source is citing disproved projections that haven't been updated in over a year.
 
This is brilliant strategy and he will be successful implementing it.

Mark my words, he will successfully make his deficit appear the fault of the Democrats and win votes by so doing.

This is what he is good at, very good at. Mass manipulation.
Yep, he'll blame it on Dem spending on social services. But I'm wondering if Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security might finally be a bridge too far for his base. Those programs are significant in Red states.
 

I don't know about you but i paid into SSI for 50 years so there had best be some money in the trust fund. This means SSI does not cost the government anything.
 
This is brilliant strategy and he will be successful implementing it.

Mark my words, he will successfully make his deficit appear the fault of the Democrats and win votes by so doing.

This is what he is good at, very good at. Mass manipulation.
Yeah, it worked so well during the shutdown.
 
I didn't misunderstand. I rejected your whataboutism.

I'm not interested in your "generic" irrelevance. We are talking about the Dems.

And I am talking about universal human tendencies, unconfined to my side or yours.
 
Politics, it would seem. But like I stated, it was a pundit's hypothesis (that seemed possible).

And annual funding bills for every aspect of government need to be signed into law as well. So Trump can hold out for any funding they might take away during the debt ceiling fight. Maybe the two sides should just act like adults and compromise on these sorts of things rather than making every penny and every issue a death match.
 
The Dems get to write the appropriation bills - are you going on record as saying they will cut spending to reduce the deficit? By the way the CBO said just last week that they are now projecting a deficit $75 billion less than they projected just a year ago and the ten-year deficit total will $1.25 trillion less than the projected then. So much for the "deficit exploding tax cuts".
 
Yeah, it worked so well during the shutdown.

There is no correlation.

I get it, you don't like TRump so all objectivity flies out the window.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…