JackFrost
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2012
- Messages
- 3,471
- Reaction score
- 513
- Location
- El Monte, California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
George Zimmerman's attorneys filed paperwork asking his judge to allow trial jurors to visit the scene of Trayvon Martin's shooting, and also to sequester his jury and keep their identities of a secret.
Meanwhile, prosecutors filed a motion asking Circuit Judge Debra Nelson to order Zimmerman's wife, Shellie, to answer questions in a pre-trial deposition.
George Zimmerman trial - OrlandoSentinel.com
Sequestering the jury makes sense.
Could we see Shellie finally spill the beans?
George Zimmerman trial - OrlandoSentinel.com
Sequestering the jury makes sense.
Could we see Shellie finally spill the beans?
As his wife she cannot be compelled to testify either in depositions or at trial.
George Zimmerman trial - OrlandoSentinel.com
Sequestering the jury makes sense.
Could we see Shellie finally spill the beans?
I think that's an excellent idea. If the prosecution objects, in my opinion, it would be wrong to do so.
As to Shellie, since she wasn't there, I can't imagine that her testimony would cast much light on what happened.
I think that's an excellent idea. If the prosecution objects, in my opinion, it would be wrong to do so.
As to Shellie, since she wasn't there, I can't imagine that her testimony would cast much light on what happened.
Very true... But, she is pleading the fifth against "self incrimination"... Something is off.
Is to Shellie, since she wasn't there, I can't imagine that her testimony would cast much light on what happened.
As his wife she cannot be compelled to testify either in depositions or at trial.
90.504 Husband-wife privilege.—
(1) A spouse has a privilege during and after the marital relationship to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, communications which were intended to be made in confidence between the spouses while they were husband and wife.
Ask any criminal lawyer and he/she likely will tell you the motive for the motion concerning his wife is to try to lock out of suddenly becoming a witness at the trial - claiming her refusal to answer questions at depositions then prevents her being allowed to testify at trial.
She was present with other witnesses when George rambled on about killing his perp. Anything said in the presence of other witnesses is not protected by husband-wife privilege in the state of Florida.
Didn't you hear, George had an entire posse with him. His wife, his friend and who knows who else. They all held Trayvon down so taht George can shoot him. Then afterwards, Shellie knocked George upa bit so they can assert the SD claim. Or so you woudl believe by listening to some of these people.
Some of the CT's going on related to this case are nutty, but I guess that's the thing about CT's.
She had contact with Zimmerman and other witnesses before and after the shooting, responded to the murder scene, and was present when Zimmerman made statements to other witnesses about his contact with and shooting of Martin.
For that she merely need fall back on the 5th amendment.
90.504 Husband-wife privilege.—
Nice try, she has pertinent information regarding the case.
There was no try.. This is essentially what Sharon and others at the Leatherman blog keep claiming. It's a big ol CT, with Shellie and Frank Taafe (and one other - can't recall who).. all being present as witneses to the murder. Yes, it really is that crazy.
There was no try.. This is essentially what Sharon and others at the Leatherman blog keep claiming. It's a big ol CT, with Shellie and Frank Taafe (and one other - can't recall who).. all being present as witneses to the murder. Yes, it really is that crazy.
She had contact with Zimmerman and other witnesses before and after the shooting, responded to the murder scene, and was present when Zimmerman made statements to other witnesses about his contact with and shooting of Martin.
Keep dodging bruh, she has pertinent information to the case.
Keep dodging bruh, she has pertinent information to the case.
I have no idea wether or not she does. But if she heard something that was stated to another witness, the pross will have no problem getting it from that witness.. One that will not be able to plead the 5th.
The fact remains, there is craziness in the air. Loud and thick.
Ask any criminal lawyer and he/she likely will tell you the motive for the motion concerning his wife is to try to lock out of suddenly becoming a witness at the trial - claiming her refusal to answer questions at depositions then prevents her being allowed to testify at trial.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?