- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
As Bush twists his tongue into knots, saying that he represents Conservative values, the facts speak otherwise. I will make my points in short order:
1) First of all, lets go right to the horse's mouth. William Kristol, the son of the father of Neoconservatism, Irving Kristol, the founder of PNAC, and the spokesman today for Neoconservatism, had this to say last year:
Here is the telling quote, which defines the actual political affiliation of Neocons, and where the Neocon movement is heading.
According to Kristol, those who follow what passes for Neocon philosophy are being repeatedly mugged, from Liberal to Neocon, and finally to an extremist Neoliberal line. There is no Conservativism here. These are hard core Liberals, and will always be hard core Liberals. And why not? The creators of Neoconservatism were once card carrying members of the Communist Party, and aligned themselves with Leon Trotsky. They only called themselves Conservatives in order to lie themselves into power.
From this article.
2) The end products speaks for TRUE IDEOLOGY of the creators of those products, so lets look at the products themselves.
Government spending - More than that of FDR, JFK, and LBJ combined. Even outside of Iraq, Bush himself has never met a domestic spending bill he didnt like, and has failed to use his veto once.
Government debt - Same here.
The Constitution - Look at what has been done with the 10th Amendment, not to speak of other amendments which are being trashed. Sure, the Neocons led the charge to eviscerate our Constitution, and Democrats and other Liberals were eager to help out. Why? Because they are all of the same cloth.
Globalization and loss of soverignty - What Bill Clinton started with NAFTA, George Bush is gleefully continuing with CAFTA.
Welfare state - Same as the Liberals, but instead of handouts to welfare mothers, corporations are now getting that same money.
Conservative, my ass. Just judge for yourself. Nothing speaks for itself like the facts.
1) First of all, lets go right to the horse's mouth. William Kristol, the son of the father of Neoconservatism, Irving Kristol, the founder of PNAC, and the spokesman today for Neoconservatism, had this to say last year:
If we have to make common cause with the more hawkish liberals and fight the conservatives, that is fine with me.
I will take Bush over Kerry, but Kerry over Buchanan ... If you read the last few issues of the Weekly Standard, it has as much or more in common with the liberal hawks than with traditional conservatives.
Here is the telling quote, which defines the actual political affiliation of Neocons, and where the Neocon movement is heading.
Alluding to his father Irving's definition of a neoconservative as a liberal who has been mugged by reality, Kristol describes a neoliberal as a "neoconservative who has been mugged by reality in Iraq."
According to Kristol, those who follow what passes for Neocon philosophy are being repeatedly mugged, from Liberal to Neocon, and finally to an extremist Neoliberal line. There is no Conservativism here. These are hard core Liberals, and will always be hard core Liberals. And why not? The creators of Neoconservatism were once card carrying members of the Communist Party, and aligned themselves with Leon Trotsky. They only called themselves Conservatives in order to lie themselves into power.
From this article.
2) The end products speaks for TRUE IDEOLOGY of the creators of those products, so lets look at the products themselves.
Government spending - More than that of FDR, JFK, and LBJ combined. Even outside of Iraq, Bush himself has never met a domestic spending bill he didnt like, and has failed to use his veto once.
Government debt - Same here.
The Constitution - Look at what has been done with the 10th Amendment, not to speak of other amendments which are being trashed. Sure, the Neocons led the charge to eviscerate our Constitution, and Democrats and other Liberals were eager to help out. Why? Because they are all of the same cloth.
Globalization and loss of soverignty - What Bill Clinton started with NAFTA, George Bush is gleefully continuing with CAFTA.
Welfare state - Same as the Liberals, but instead of handouts to welfare mothers, corporations are now getting that same money.
Conservative, my ass. Just judge for yourself. Nothing speaks for itself like the facts.