• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Debates commission plans to cut off mics if Trump or Biden break rules

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Can you quote the part of the Statute that indicates Congress anticipates that sites would censor content based on the political opinion expressed and that it would be allowed or can't you.
Can you quote the part of the statute that indicates your opinion/approval is required before any political content is censored?
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Yep, you have told me, and every other member who reads this thread, that you are dishonest and ignore facts that don’t support your opinions.
Reality has kicked you in the butt.
Social media censors.
Jack Dorsey admitted it but you still hang on to your fantasy.
Good luck widdat.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Reality has kicked you in the butt.
Why are you continuing to embarrass yourself?

Your lies have been completely busted.

The language of Section 230 doesn’t support any of the lies you’ve been spouting.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Why are you continuing to embarrass yourself?

Your lies have been completely busted.

The language of Section 230 doesn’t support any of the lies you’ve been spouting.
Jack Dorsey admitted Twitter does what you keep denying they do.
Everyone else realizes it now.
You've got a serious problem, my friend.
 

Northern Light

The Light of Truth
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2013
Messages
6,676
Reaction score
4,152
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I hope they really do this.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Social media censors.
This is new to you?
Jack Dorsey admitted it ...
Jack Dorsey acknowledged that his company follows the law as outlined in Section 230.

Tell ya what, you can keep on lying about Section 230 here in this thread. The proof is posted, so that other members who aren’t familiar with the statute can read it for themselves.


I’ll see you in the next thread where you lie about Section 230. (y)
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Jack Dorsey admitted Twitter does what you keep denying they do.
Everyone else realizes it now.
You've got a serious problem, my friend.
1. I haven’t denied that Twitter censors. It is their legitimate legal right.

You should learn to deal with that fact.

2. You don’t speak for anyone but yourself.

3.
(a) Lying is your problem.
(b) I’m not your friend. I have no use people who lie.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
1. I haven’t denied that Twitter censors. It is their legitimate legal right.

You should learn to deal with that fact.

2. You don’t speak for anyone but yourself.

3.
(a) Lying is your problem.
(b) I’m not your friend. I have no use people who lie.
If the Law was crafted to give Twitter the legal right to censor political speech and still retain legal immunity, why did Dorsey scramble so fast to admit they made a mistake in order to keep Twitter's legal immunity?
To paraphrase Sen. Feinstein, Denialism lives loudly within you.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
If the Law was crafted to give Twitter the legal right to censor political speech and still retain legal immunity, why did Dorsey scramble so fast to admit they made a mistake in order to keep Twitter's legal immunity?
To paraphrase Sen. Feinstein, Denialism lives loudly within you.
^^ More unsupported fiction.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
^^ More unsupported fiction.
Ah, yet another question to be added to the list of those you dare not answer honestly.

Look, you made a mistake misreading the Law because you were driven by partisanship and you thought you were expected to take the position you did. It's understandable on that level.
You see it happen a lot around here when ideology overrides common sense.
But your simple mistake turned into a huge rolling blunder when you kept insisting it wasn't a mistake, and since then you've done nothing but compound your error.
Current events should have driven that point home like a nail gun to the temple. Okay ... maybe that's overly dramatic.
Just say you misinterpreted the intent of Section 230 and there'll be no need to say any more about it.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Ah, yet another question to be added to the list of those you dare not answer honestly.

Look, you made a mistake misreading the Law because you were driven by partisanship and you thought you were expected to take the position you did. It's understandable on that level.
You see it happen a lot around here when ideology overrides common sense.
But your simple mistake turned into a huge rolling blunder when you kept insisting it wasn't a mistake, and since then you've done nothing but compound your error.
Current events should have driven that point home like a nail gun to the temple. Okay ... maybe that's overly dramatic.
Just say you misinterpreted the intent of Section 230 and there'll be no need to say any more about it.
If you actually believed your own lies you would post proof (like I have) instead of more empty partisan blathering.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
If you actually believed your own lies you would post proof (like I have) instead of more empty partisan blathering.
Your proof ... wasn't.
That's why your answers to what I asked ... haven't been.
And unfortunately for you, real life events have closed in around you as proof you have been wrong.
Are you aware of those events?
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Your proof ... wasn't.
That's why your answers to what I asked ... haven't been.
And unfortunately for you, real life events have closed in around you as proof you have been wrong.
Are you aware of those events?
You’re going to tell me about real life events? You, the same person who repeatedly has made claims, offering zero evidence?

Pass.
 
Last edited:

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
You’re going to tell me about real life events? You, the same person who repeatedly has made claims, offering zero evidence?

Pass.
Well ... that's another question for the list of questions you're too afraid to answer honestly.
Ain't good for your mental health, my friend.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Well ... that's another question for the list of questions you're too afraid to answer honestly.
Ain't good for your mental health, my friend.
Try a new approach. Post facts supported by links, like I have.
 

vesper

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
21,531
Reaction score
18,084
Location
Midwest
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
I am looking forward to the debate. I hear it is on foreign policy. If so, Trump's loaded for bear. And I am sure he will take the opportunity to point out how Biden handled things. You know everywhere Biden and Hunter went Hunter was the vacuum cleaner sucking up all the quid pro quos to enrich his family. Should be a hoot!
 

Rexedgar

Yo-Semite!
Supporting Member
Monthly Subscriber
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 6, 2017
Messages
28,844
Reaction score
17,239
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I am looking forward to the debate. I hear it is on foreign policy. If so, Trump's loaded for bear. And I am sure he will take the opportunity to point out how Biden handled things. You know everywhere Biden and Hunter went Hunter was the vacuum cleaner sucking up all the quid pro quos to enrich his family. Should be a hoot!
Good Robot!


 

vesper

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
21,531
Reaction score
18,084
Location
Midwest
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Good Robot!


Yes the vacuum cleaner line is Trump's latest and that is why I used it. And I have no doubt he will work it in during the debate.
 

Lursa

Tenacious
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
68,136
Reaction score
39,847
Location
Outside Seattle
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Independent
So if they do the final debate, in person, together, do you think they'll employ the mike cut-off option?

I really hope so, I'd love to see it. I bet The Donald would stomp off stage.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Try a new approach. Post facts supported by links, like I have.
Oh yes. I should have thanked you for posting confirmation of what I was trying to tell you - even though you still don't realize it. Is that what you wanted to hear? Friends again?
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Oh yes. I should have thanked you for posting confirmation of what I was trying to tell you - even though you still don't realize it. Is that what you wanted to hear? Friends again?
More fiction.
 

bubbabgone

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 25, 2013
Messages
28,388
Reaction score
15,454
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
More fiction.
Geez.
You're not even aware that what you posted disproved your own hypothesis.
I guess then I shouldn't be surprised that you're also not aware that Twitter is in trouble for doing what you say is not a problem.
 

RaleBulgarian

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 20, 2018
Messages
14,928
Reaction score
6,152
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Geez.
You're not even aware that what you posted disproved your own hypothesis.
I guess then I shouldn't be surprised that you're also not aware that Twitter is in trouble for doing what you say is not a problem.
Are you ever going to stop blathering and post proof of your beliefs.

Oh, that’s right, you can’t, because none exists.
 
Top Bottom