McTojo said:
Here's a little tid bit for you. When you single out one race of people like the Chinese who constantly complain about Japans wartime aggression, it makes you think that only the Chinese suffered under Japan's military aggression.
I singled out Chinese? Did I? I believe I also showed of Korean, Vietnamese, Burma, Phillipines and so on. Did I not say East Asia and southeast asia? Yes I did.
McTojo said:
In the case of Hitler and the Jews it's the same parallelism: ("The Japanese imperialist regime was responsible for inflicting great wounds upon millions of poor little Chinese people"). Or (" Hitler was a monster who was systematically responsible for his attempt at trying to annihilate the Jews"). In fact, and most historians would agree, is that Hitler murdered more Slavs and more Gypsies than he did the Jews, and yet nobody is lamenting their plight and suffering...not even today. You think the Jews care ?? They use every opportunity like the Chinese to point the spot light on their suffering.
Did I not point out clearly that the Germans slaughtered those who were non-Arian? Yes again I did. Try to stay on track.
Though I'm not questioning the slavs and gypsies but I would prefer you back up your claim with a reputtable source.
McTojo said:
China in the traditional sense has officially 56 nationalities within its borders as follows;
Han
Zhuang
Manchu
Hui
Miao
Uygur
Yi
Tujia
Mongol
Tibetan
Buyei
Dong
Yao
Chosen meaning Koreans.
Bai
Hani
Li
Kazak
Dai
She
Lisu
Gelao
Lahu
Dongxiang
Va
Sui
Naxi
Qiang
Tu
Xibe
Mulao
Kirgi
Daur
Jingpo
Salar
Blang
Maonan
Tajik
Pumi
Achang
Nu
Ewenki
Gin
Jino
De'ang
Uzbek
Russ
Yugur
Bonan
Monba
Oroqen
Derung
Tatar
Hezhen
Lhoba
Gaoshan
Nationalities? You seem confused, these are ethnicities.
McTojo said:
To indiscriminately call all individuals of the listed groups IN China "Chinese" would amount to ignorance and nothing else. What Chinese were murdered?
China is a nation, Chinese is a nationality, you know like being American is a nationality and not an ethnicity. Those that you brought up are ethnicities. So if you want to make it so they are all nationalities, fine so be it, Japan also murdered on top of those that I mentioned, let's add in the 56 other nationalities in there. All in cold blood and all indiscriminatly because of the feeling that these nationalities were less human then Japanese.
McTojo said:
how do you know millions of Chinese were murdered ? The IMTFE didn't even have substantial evidence enough then to win an overwhelming conviction against Tojo if millions of Chinese were in fact murdered ? For your information, Iris Chang committed suicide awhile back so you can't use her analogy anymore.
first off, What does Iris Chang committing suicide have anything to do with the validity of her claims even if I were using her claims? WHy would I then not be able to use her Analogy? Not to mention the fact that she commited suicide from the constant harrasement from Japanese radicalist right wing fanatic nationalists.
Where have I acquired my figures?
Here you go.
Source 1 - A contest to see who could slaughter the most in a day.
Source 2 - You add up the numbers and see if you get numbers. Nanking is one, then there are also the bio experiments and warfare in Manchuria (
source 3) that I have mentioned more then once that you have ignored to mention or respond to. Note China is not the only country?
Source 4 -
The Chinese lost approximately 3.22 million soldiers. 9.13 million
civilians died in the crossfire, and another
8.4 million as non-military casualties. (A interesting comparison: The commonly used figure for the number of Jewish victims as a result of the Nazi Holocaust is six million) Some Chinese historians claimed the total military and non-military deaths of the Chinese were at most 35 million. Most Western historians believed that the casualties were at least 20 million.
Source 5 -
It may be pointless to try to establish which World War Two Axis aggressor, Germany or Japan, was the more brutal to the peoples it victimised. The Germans killed six million Jews and 20 million Russians [i.e. Soviet citizens]; the Japanese slaughtered as many as 30 million Filipinos, Malays, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Indonesians and Burmese, at least 23 million of them ethnic Chinese. Both nations looted the countries they conquered on a monumental scale, though Japan plundered more, over a longer period, than the Nazis. Both conquerors enslaved millions and exploited them as forced labourers — and, in the case of the Japanese, as [forced] prostitutes for front-line troops. If you were a Nazi prisoner of war from Britain, America, Australia, New Zealand or Canada (but not Russia) you faced a 4 % chance of not surviving the war; [by comparison] the death rate for Allied POWs held by the Japanese was nearly 30 %. "The Looting of Asia" - Chalmers Johnson professor emeritus of the University of California, San Diego
Source 6 - R. J. Rummel, a professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, states that between 1937 and 1945, the Japanese military "murdered near 3,000,000 to over 10,000,000 people, most probably almost 6,000,000 Chinese, Indonesians, Koreans, Filipinos, and Indochinese, among others, including Western prisoners of war. This democide was due to a morally bankrupt political and military strategy, military expediency and custom, and national culture.
Shall I go on? It's not too difficult seeing as hindsight is 20/20.
McTojo said:
I have problem with the legitimacy of the claims that have been lodged against Japan. Japan did cause great suffering throughout greater asia, not just China. It's not about China & Japan. It's about the whole of asia. Japan has apologized publically 25 times and has paid billions in reparations to these nations. That's it ! For China to continue to spot light the issue as centeral to diplomatic relations is childish and ignorant.
Who ever stated or insinuated that this was only about China vs Japan?
Japan has not once publicly apologized at all for it's war attrocities. Not once.
You claim 25, please show us those 25 times.
For Japan whom claims to be an economic leader in the world, a "civil and humble industrialized nation" why does it refuse to accept it's wartime past. Why do those like you refuse to accept the reality that Imperliast Japan was nothing more then a savage slaughterhouse against those nations whom she invaded. Germany has admited so and made countless apologies, infact as I've stated earlier it is illegal for Germans not to know of the holocoust, yet quite sadly the same can not be said for Japan. There would be no issue for the communist party of beijing to spotlight if Japan simply just festered up and made official appologies and took out those enshrined in Yasukuni. Yet Japan denies all this and enshrines war criminals - disgusting.