• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dear David Axelrod: Be very careful what you wish for


May 11, 2013
Reaction score
Political Leaning
By Rick Moran
September 1, 2013

President Obama's political guru David Axelrod tweeted what many liberals have been saying on social media and across the cable nets since the president announced he would seek congressional approval for a strike on Syria.

Axelrod was in full gloat:


Big move by POTUS. Consistent with his principles. Congress is now the dog that caught the car. Should be a fascinating week!​

Consistent with what "principles," Dave? The principle that the president stood on when he unilaterally and without congressional authorization took the country to war in Libya?

What Axelrod and many liberals are delighted about is that the GOP - especially in the House - will now be in a similar position to where Democrats were in early 2002 with Iraq; the prospect of political damage if they voted against war.

He don't know them very well, do he.

Jonathan Strong at NRO:(Will the House Authorize a Syria Strike? | National Review Online)

GOP sources say it is highly unlikely leadership will whip support for the proposal; such "votes of conscience" are typically left to members' discretion.

While there is still plenty of time for Obama to make the case for war, lawmakers are still seeking answers to big questions, chief among them being what a strike would accomplish.

That's true among Democrats as well. One Democratic aide says if the "strategic objective is to slap someone's wrist," that won't exactly be compelling.

Some liberal commentators have reacted with glee that Obama's plan puts the political onus on Speaker John Boehner. But the initial reaction by Republican insiders is that Obama faces far more risk, since he would look profoundly weak in defeat.​

Read more:
Blog: Dear David Axelrod: Be very careful what you wish for

Gee I remember telling people the same thing before Obama was elected in 2008.
Top Bottom