• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Dean seeks new election in Fla. race (1 Viewer)

Should the House refuse to seat Buchanan, thus forcing a new election?

  • Yes - Evidence shows that enough votes were not recorded so that Jennings was denied victory.

    Votes: 3 75.0%
  • No - The Democrats are whining about not gaining Katherine Harris' old seat.

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
The House of Representatives may either refuse to seat Republican Vern Buchanan when they convene in January, or they may seat him, only to unseat him at a later date. The central issue is whether all the votes in Katherine Harris' old district were counted, or whether the machines malfunctioned in a Democratic area, thus recording no vote for Christine Jennings, and giving Buchanan the election victory. It is hard to say, so let me start a poll on this and see what everyone thinks.

Article is here.
 
Last edited:
State officials certified Buchanan as the winner by just 369 votes... More than 18,000 Sarasota County voters who marked other races didn't have a vote register in the House race, a rate much higher than the rest of the district.

They definitely should have a new election.
 
They definitely should have a new election.

If they can show unequivocally that machine malfunctions led to Jennings' loss, then there should be a new election. However, so far, they have not proven their case, which means that, at this time, I voted no in the poll.
 
This vote was hilarious:
You can bet that if the Republicans were 500 votes short they'd be calling for a new election, and they'd be right," Dean said.

Because the Republicans are well known for complaining about non-existent voter irregularities and contesting elections...oh, wait....
 
If they can show unequivocally that machine malfunctions led to Jennings' loss, then there should be a new election. However, so far, they have not proven their case, which means that, at this time, I voted no in the poll.

Never mind that such a thing would require a state law allowing it, if it was allowable at all.
 
You would think in a state thats going to be as heavily scrutinized as Florida, they could get voting right.
 
Never mind that such a thing would require a state law allowing it, if it was allowable at all.

Actually, if the Democrats refuse to seat the new Congressman, then Florida would have no choice, which I believe is what Dean is referring to. Which brings up an interesting question. Why does the House have such power, if the Constitution provides that the states elect their own Congressmen?
 
Actually, if the Democrats refuse to seat the new Congressman, then Florida would have no choice, which I believe is what Dean is referring to. Which brings up an interesting question. Why does the House have such power, if the Constitution provides that the states elect their own Congressmen?

Does the house have the power to refuse to "seat" a representative?
 
Does the house have the power to refuse to "seat" a representative?

Yes, although it has only been done a handful of times since the founding of the US. I believe that the Supreme Court should take this case, and decide if Congress has this power legitimately, or if it is usurping the power of the states in refusing to seat a Congressman. It would be an interesting case.
 
You would think in a state thats going to be as heavily scrutinized as Florida, they could get voting right.

You are forgetting that Katharine Harris was in charge.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom