- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Weird, it didn't. Not only that, all the medical people attending to Z noted no significant or long term damage due to the injuries he suffered.
I am assuming because be shot him before it WAS life threatening. Are you suggesting that in self defense situations, I need to determine exactly how hard someone is slamming my head on the ground? That I need to be sure that it COULD kill me (or cause grievous bodily harm)? And if I am on grass...I can't shoot my assailant because, hey...getting my ass beat from an opponent in full mount...isn't enough grounds to say I am going to get my ass kicked.
If Trayvon was on top and beating his ass, that is grounds to kill him. That is justified under Grievous bodily harm. You arm chair quarterbacks are hilarious. You think there is time to assess how badly you are getting beat? Do you even understand the precedent you are setting?