• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

D.C. grand jurors reject latest wave of Justice Dept. indictment requests

ColdHardTruth

SN/YN US NAVY
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
28,063
Reaction score
25,063
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

D.C. grand jurors reject latest wave of Justice Dept. indictment requests​

Washington — What was happening in the criminal case of Nathalie Rose Jones, who was facing charges in Washington, D.C., federal court this summer, wasn't typical.

A grand jury of D.C. citizens on Tuesday had denied the Justice Department's request to indict Jones, who was accused of a federal crime for allegedly posting an Instagram threat against President Trump.

"Not only have I never heard of this happening, I've never heard of a prosecutor who's heard of this happening," said former federal prosecutor Brendan Ballou, who served in the U.S. Attorney's Office for in D.C. until January 2025.

"This is not the fault of career prosecutors, but rather the office's failure—again and again—to secure indictments suggests that the administration has absolutely destroyed its credibility with jurors," Ballou told CBS News.
The GQP scum in the DOJ have killed its credibility. It is now a joke.

D.C. grand jurors reject latest wave of Justice Dept. indictment requests

One former federal prosecutor said of the indictment denials by D.C. grand juries that he's "never heard of this happening."
www.cbsnews.com
 
I don’t think it’s very wise to start a jury nullification war but you do you.
 
DOJ

Destruction Of Justice
 
Certainly needs to be a lot more information added to this. Why, exactly they declined to indict.
 
I am starting to see the wisdom of having a jury of one's peers.
 
For every action, there is an equal reaction.
 
Napoleon said:
I don’t think it’s very wise to start a jury nullification war but you do you.
Click to expand...



You don't?

Well, obviously your opinion is very relevant and important to all of us, so by all means, feel free to explain whatever this gibberish is supposed to mean.
 
People are growing tired of the Bondi DoJ making Federal cases out of numerous incidents that should be misdemeanors.

Folks are also dog-tired of masked ICE agents tossing their LEO weight around because they can.

Bondi has outright weaponized the Department of Justice. Looking to make examples out of everyone (except card carrying Republicans and the wealthy).
 
Napoleon said:
I don’t think it’s very wise to start a jury nullification war but you do you.
Click to expand...
Why is it everyone elses fault all the ****ing time with you..

Stop..just stop with this act
 
Integrityrespec said:
Certainly needs to be a lot more information added to this. Why, exactly they declined to indict.
Click to expand...
The article does not say but I would imagine because there was not threat. It's also likely that Pirro is a moron with an orange dick print on her forehead who has her face buried in Trump's diaper.

This was nothing but a retaliation by Trump and the people involved basically told Trump to **** off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…