- Joined
- Mar 3, 2018
- Messages
- 16,876
- Reaction score
- 7,397
- Location
- San Diego
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
What a smocktangle ~!
View attachment 67246204
But no, of course, dems are "out to get Trump". Yeah, I suppose Mueller and the SDNY are just making stuff up and busting them.
Get real.
What a smocktangle ~!
View attachment 67246204
But no, of course, dems are "out to get Trump". Yeah, I suppose Mueller and the SDNY are just making stuff up and busting them.
Get real.
Trump's goin' down, it's not IF, but WHEN.
Seventeen separate witch hunts?
Who else are they going to trick into pleading guilty for the purpose of spiting Trump by sending themselves to federal prison?
What a smocktangle ~!
View attachment 67246204
But no, of course, dems are "out to get Trump". Yeah, I suppose Mueller and the SDNY are just making stuff up and busting them.
Get real.
Trump's goin' down, it's not IF, but WHEN.
Seventeen separate witch hunts?
Who else are they going to trick into pleading guilty for the purpose of spiting Trump by sending themselves to federal prison?
Apparently you haven't read the memo released by Mueller which was the transcript of the questions by investigators posed to Flynn, will they reveal the truth that the narrative you are attempting to give here is utterly false, that the FBI gave many many opportunities for Flynn to tell the truth rephrasing the question making sure that's what it's Matt's and so forth and so forth so you guys really need to stop this baloney.
Once you read it the only just and logical and fair conclusion was that Flynn had to plead guilty before he was guilty.
When was no Spring Chicken in this ordeal
What a smocktangle ~!
View attachment 67246204
But no, of course, dems are "out to get Trump". Yeah, I suppose Mueller and the SDNY are just making stuff up and busting them.
Get real.
Trump's goin' down, it's not IF, but WHEN.
First:What a smocktangle ~!
View attachment 67246204
But no, of course, dems are "out to get Trump". Yeah, I suppose Mueller and the SDNY are just making stuff up and busting them.
Get real.
Trump's goin' down, it's not IF, but WHEN.
You forgot the Kindergarten Milk Cart Probe, the Third Grade Recess Dodge Ball Probe, and the Being Seen Having Russian Salad Dressing Probe....
View attachment 67246208
View attachment 67246209
You forgot the Kindergarten Milk Cart Probe, the Third Grade Recess Dodge Ball Probe, and the Being Seen Having Russian Salad Dressing Probe....
]
First:Something form 2015 that I suspect many folks don't know:
[*=1]Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort $10 Million for Significant and Long Standing Anti-Money Laundering Violations
[*=1]See also: Trump Taj Mahal Sold (2017) -- Trump maintained a small ownership stake in the property. I don't know about you, but I don't and never have had an ownership stake in anything wherein money laundering was involved. Trump, on the other hand, has money launderers "all around" him.
Second:
Some of those investigations are "Trump-adjacent." Nonetheless, almost every extant Trump-specific organization is also under investigation, mostly by his own DoJ, no less.
- The special counsel's probe
- The campaign-finance investigation -- This is basically the Trump-specific case pertaining to what the SDNY has already asserted re: Trump's role in conspiring with Cohen to effect illegal campaign contributions.
- Scrutiny of the inaugural committee -- Investigations on the receipts and disbursements end.
- Foreign inaugural committee contributions -- W. Samuel Patten, admitted steering $50K from a Ukrainian politician to the inaugural committee through a straw donor. Patten pleaded guilty to failing to register as a foreign lobbyist and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.
- Inaugural committee expenditures.
- The emoluments clause lawsuits -- Trump’s businesses have hosted parties for foreign embassies, hosted Malaysia’s prime minister and Maine’s governor, and rented more than 500 rooms to lobbyists paid by the Saudi government. "Trump said [we know how worthless his word is] he gave up day-to-day management of his business while he is in the White House, he still owns his businesses and can withdraw money from them at any time."
- New York state inquiries -- Looking look into whether Trump had violated the emoluments clause by doing business with foreign governments in New York and examining allegations that Trump’s company engaged in unlawful tax practices.
How many other folks in Trump's socioeconomic stratum are or have done legally-questionable-to-illegal "stuff" in every major facet of their goings on? I don't know about you, but of all the rich, poor and somewhere-in-between folks I know, only one, a non-American, has ever been considered for anything like the range of criminal/illegal behavior that Trump has (prior to 2016) and again is (2016 and later).
Third:
A Complete Guide to Trump's 17 Investigations
Thank you Xelor. Your comments are often very informative and add a lot to the discourse.
The old tired trick of trivializing an argument is not a rebuttal. I recommend a thorough study of the Carl Sagan Baloney Detection Kit.
Tossing out (probably russian ) memes without substance, typical of the right, isn't a refutation of anything.
In short, your rebuttal is incompetent.