- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
"Not so bad"? Well that is incredibly vague and incredibly subjective. What I originally claimed from the get go, "Its most likely around actually 11 cents an hours. But its also leaving out many other extremely important variables like cost of living, government subsidies, little to no taxes, gov programs offered to all Cubans."No, you implied that the wage plus subsidies from the government made it not so bad in Cuba.
Simply pointed out that your claim that it was.05 cents an hour was wrong and that you are leaving out many other variables.
Except it does, see the Helms Burton Act. Pointed this out in my earlier post.What blockade? The US embargo doesn't effect Cuban trade with the rest of the world.
Not at all. Its like saying when state employees get paid in the US by the federal government and the federal government does not pay them 100% of their labor value and keeps some of their labor value as profit for themselves is a tax. No-one calculates like that.I never argued otherwise. You are simply making an weak semantic argument that a state that confiscates 97% of production has low taxes....
In the manner you are doing it, yes. Comparing a Marxist-Leninist system with modern day left wing Americans calling for a welfare state? Completely an apples to oranges comparison.That is a silly comment. So we can't compare and contrast different economic systems because they are different?
Sure, I'm defending the information I am presenting because I think you are leaving it out of a subjective analysis.But you are defending it, though.
I dont think its great and I dont think its a hell hole.I think it's a hell hole, you think it isn't so bad because the government doles out food to its starving populace.
Again, the right to sell ones house on a open market is not then end all be all for owning a house.And what rights do the title impart on the title owner? The right to sell?
You can build in your house, you can plant a garden on your property... In factThe right to build or plant? Nope, the government controls that.
Uhh yes you can.. Did we not discuss the private sector in Cuba?The right to keep the proceeds of a sale the government authorized? Nope.
Except they are owning the home.It's not ownership. The Cuban people are essentially borrowing land from the Government who maintains ultimate ownership and control.
So there we go, you are essentially admitting that the ultimate caveat in home ownership is if you can sell said home on a open market. :roll:Ummmm, no.