- Joined
- Jan 20, 2020
- Messages
- 741
- Reaction score
- 154
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
In this video, Peter Daszak, a member of the WHO team, explained why the WHO report concluded that a lab incident was “extremely unlikely”. He said : “They never had any evidence of a virus like Covid in the lab”.
But he was wrong.
The envelope protein of a SARS-like coronavirus, registered in GenBank as AVP78033.1 , submitted 05-JAN-2018 by Institute of Military Medicine Nanjing Command, is 100% identical to the envelope protein of COVID-19.
This proves that back in 2018, the Institute of Military Medicine Nanjing Command had already obtained at least one virus very similar to COVID-19.
The envelope protein of another SARS-like coronavirus, registered in GenBank as AGZ48809.1, submitted 08-APR-2013 by Wuhan Institute of Virology, is very similar ( 94.74% similarity ) to the envelope protein of COVID-19.
This proved that back in 2013, the Wuhan Institute of Virology had already obtained at least one virus very similar to COVID-19.
Although the CCP destroyed samples soon after the outbreak, some evidences still exist in GenBank.
https://www.independentsciencenews....auci-francis-collins-systematically-thwarted/
Regarding the inspection personnel, at least one member of the WHO mission team, Ecohealth Alliance President Dr. Peter Daszak, seems to have conflicts of interest that should have disqualified him from being part of an investigation of the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Yes. Daszak was the contractor who funded the laboratory at WIV that potentially was the source of the virus (with subcontracts from $200 million from the US Department of State and $7 million from the US National Institutes of Health), and he was a collaborator and co-author on research projects at the laboratory.