• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cousin's final decision on healthcare insurance

Wow. It's like you didn't even try. Feel free to point out anything I said that is actually incorrect.

I did. Yes or no, is maternity and newborn care insurance free? Remember, yes, or no.
 
And don't forget the poor, who cannot afford insurance and are slapped with a big fine they can't afford either. Honestly, this blind support of this cluster is akin to a mental disorder. :roll:

Poor people were supposed to be covered under the medicaid expansion. But republicans took that to court and made sure that those poor people wouldn't get it. Not that you care about the truth
 
I did. Yes or no, is maternity and newborn care insurance free? Remember, yes, or no.

I never said it was free. Please point out anything I said that was incorrect.
 
Actually nothing you've ranted about addresses my point. The 10 "ESSENTIAL BENEFITS" aren't really so essential. If you'd like to talk about reality then start by addressing what I said and not what you wish I had said.
 
Actually nothing you've ranted about addresses my point. The 10 "ESSENTIAL BENEFITS" aren't really so essential. If you'd like to talk about reality then start by addressing what I said and not what you wish I had said.

So to clarify, you don't claim that this 60 year old woman is paying for maternity care?
 
very few suffer the enormous increases in premium. keep in mind truth isnt common on these forums.
Premiums did not spike up after aca was passed and they are not continuing to rise? Everything ive read says otherwise.

Also your response has not addressed the question i asked. I asked what great improvements it has over the old system.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
It's called, paying for those who are getting it for "free", and also paying for other's pre-existing conditions.
We were already paying for those that who received it for free. The difference is that they got bare bones treatment which kept the costs somewhat managable.

The preexisting conditions issue is a bit more complicated but that was the industries answer to mandates. As a young man i had always carried decent health coverage even though i rarely used it because i understood that if i did become ill i would not be able to insure myself after the fact. Aca removed that incentive for young people to keep coverage.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Poor people were supposed to be covered under the medicaid expansion. But republicans took that to court and made sure that those poor people wouldn't get it. Not that you care about the truth
Fair enough, the Republicans did in fact try many many things to block its implimentation. The question is did they have good reason to?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…