Really? So there will never be a potential treatment that requires the DNA of the patient to be known? And you know this how?
not sure i support this one; there's a lot more info to be gleaned from DNA. thoughts on this decision?
I've been thinking about this for a while, and I'm actually kind of excited about it. Allll those cold cases about to become hot. I can't help thinking this is a victory for the good guys.
How in the world is this a victory for the good guys? They are forced to giving up their property to the state on arrest. There is nothing good about the state taking your property against you will, nothing.
Catching and incarcerating criminals is a good thing. Making it easier for law enforcement and tougher on criminals is a good thing. We've used fingerprints as a crime fighting tool for over a hundred years. This is just one more tool. Cold case criminals should be sleeping poorly right about now.
People have owned personal property ever since their bodies were created, so I win the fight over who has been around longer. Furthermore, aggression against people is always bad and it doesn't make a bit of difference if something good comes out of it. It is still ethically wrong to take part in.
People have owned personal property ever since the human race was created as they own their bodies, so I win the fight over who has been around longer. Furthermore, aggression against people is always bad and it doesn't make a bit of difference if something good comes out of it. It is still ethically wrong to take part in.
Your fingerprints belong to you, too. Tell me what the difference is? Or maybe, now that you've thought about it, you don't think the coppers ought to be able to collect those either.
And yet people throw this property away evey minute of every day. Guess it would be better it we collected DNA from the sewage pipe and fingerpirnts from beer bottles!
What are you talking about?Which never happens nor is their any sort of guarantee the government will actually give up such information.
It can and it must, because your status as a person, rights to privacy, and protections from certain government actions are not grounded in property rights.Btw, you of course have ownership towards your own body, just like the child owns theirs. It can be no other other way.
No, I'm merely using the law as a convenient reference point. It's a codification and formalization of how we handle rights.Of course, all you listen to is the government, so talking to you is like screaming at cement and demanding it to not dry.
Yes, it is. The instant you throw something in the trash, it is no longer your property. You are explicitly putting it in the trash because you no longer want it. You are not only removing it from your premises, in most cases you are handing it over to a municipal agency for disposal.I already dealt with the argument of abandonment. The consent of throwing away something or simply touching something is not consent to anything else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?