• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Could you climb this wall by yourself without equipment?

Could you do it?

  • Total voters
    19
dex4974 said:
If we finished the wall that wouldn't be an option. You are not debating in good faith.
Click to expand...
Never going to "finish" this wall....
 
Casper said:
Why, the Republicans won't be in charge of anything in two weeks....no deal
Click to expand...

Without the lowest education demographic groups the Democratic Party would only qualify as a 3rd party, with Joe Biden having added that Democrats are now banned from accepting any facts.

Thus, it is no surprise to read a Democrat claiming that Democrats take control of the White House, both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court in 2 weeks - rather than starting next year. Why? Because Democrats have been ordered by Biden to be the stupidest people on earth. That is what people who never accept facts are. A few Democrats on the forum are already in fierce competition to prove who is the most loyal Democrat by posting the most stupid messages.

I would explain when the transfer of power actually happens, but we know you are ordered by Quid Pro Quo Joe Beijing Biden to refuse to accept facts.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
A safety rope is absolutely a climbing aid. However regardless of what ever semantic argument you are making, no in eight-year-old girl did not climb a replica of the fence with no equipment. Because by your own admission she was using equipment
Click to expand...
The safety rope did not help her climb, it was to prevent her from getting hurt if she fell, but she didn't fall she got to the top under her own power.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
It’s irrelevant what percentages of crossings came legally, because that’s not what the wall is intended to stop.
Click to expand...
Stopping illegal crossings is pointless if all you've done is make them cross legally.
Covid aside, about 20,000 pedestrians and 70,000 vehicles cross daily at just one crossing point. That's where illegal immigration happens. At legal border crossings.
 
wolfsgirl said:
The safety rope did not help her climb, it was to prevent her from getting hurt if she fell, but she didn't fall she got to the top under her own power.
Click to expand...
A safety rope absolutely helps you climb. Safety equipment incentivizes risk taking that would otherwise not be present. She wouldn’t be climbing any wall at all without a rope and adult to guide her. If she was actually climbing a real border wall the border patrol would be there to arrest her long before she made it down.
 
Grand Mal said:
Stopping illegal crossings is pointless if all you've done is make them cross legally.
Covid aside, about 20,000 pedestrians and 70,000 vehicles cross daily at just one crossing point. That's where illegal immigration happens. At legal border crossings.
Click to expand...
Most of these people don’t qualify to cross legally or else they would’ve done it.

I think you mean most illegal aliens are visa overstays and that requires a different solution then the land border, but it’s no reason not to enforce the land border, the reason vis overstays are higher is because we have fences and agents stopping physical entry
 
joko104 said:
Without the lowest education demographic groups the Democratic Party would only qualify as a 3rd party, with Joe Biden having added that Democrats are now banned from accepting any facts.

Thus, it is no surprise to read a Democrat claiming that Democrats take control of the White House, both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court in 2 weeks - rather than starting next year. Why? Because Democrats have been ordered by Biden to be the stupidest people on earth. That is what people who never accept facts are. A few Democrats on the forum are already in fierce competition to prove who is the most loyal Democrat by posting the most stupid messages.

I would explain when the transfer of power actually happens, but we know you are ordered by Quid Pro Quo Joe Beijing Biden to refuse to accept facts.
Click to expand...
/// " but we know you are........." /// <------ This is the most rapid path to losing an argument. ( trying and failing to tell others things than can't be proven to be factual)
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Most of these people don’t qualify to cross legally or else they would’ve done it.

I think you mean most illegal aliens are visa overstays and that requires a different solution then the land border, but it’s no reason not to enforce the land border, the reason vis overstays are higher is because we have fences and agents stopping physical entry
Click to expand...
^^^ Nothing but unproven speculation. Dismissed as there is ZERO proof ANY of these claims are factual.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
You don’t declare asylum...
Click to expand...
You're making a lot of hay out of a typo.


that aside; the fact that barriers reduce crossings by 80+ percent is general knowledge
Click to expand...
Or, it's just BS that you made up. There is no correlation between border crossings and walls. As I pointed out already in this thread: We didn't build slowly tear down walls between 1960 and 1984; alternately put up and tear down walls until 2000; put up more walls every year between 2000 and 2016; then start tearing down walls in 2017.

Southwest Border Apprehensions vs. Year (1).png
 
EMNofSeattle said:
Yeah and if you bought it at any time in the last 30 years you’ll see your ladder is covered with stickers warning you how not to kill yourself with it. It’s dangerous.
Click to expand...
That's your argument? Stickers on a ladder? lol....


and yes walls work great for their intended purpose. It causes these migrants to pay for for smugglers or risk dying in the desert in a remote area where There is no border fence.
Click to expand...
No, dude. It fails. Badly.

The purpose of the wall isn't to make it more expensive or slower to cross, that is completely and utterly pointless. Yet again, someone who spends weeks traveling from Central America isn't going to be deterred because it takes and extra 10 minutes to climb a rope ladder.


You seem to have invented this weird bizarro fantasy land where if a wall does not work 100% to stop all illegal entries into America....
Click to expand...
That's because... Walls don't stop border crossers. That sure sounds like a failure to me.
 
EMNofSeattle said:
A safety rope is absolutely a climbing aid.
Click to expand...
What a pathetic response. She didn't use the rope to climb, the ropes are only used if she loses her grip and falls.

Like it or not, it's easy to get through these walls, and it doesn't stop border crossers. It also doesn't stop people who drive or fly into the US, and overstay their visas. It also doesn't stop anyone who hides in the back of a truck and is smuggled through the border.
 
Could you climb this wall by yourself without equipment?


Piece of cake . . .


skynews-trump-border-wall_4570250_a.jpg




:)
 
LouC said:
"Gordotrump, tear down this wall!"

:)
Click to expand...

If Trump tries to dismantle Obamacare simply because Obama built it, then the most appropriate payback is to have Obama's VP try to dismantle the wall simply because Trump built it (in fact he did not even build more than a few miles). Biden can aso promise that if he wins the elections, the Trump wall will be replaced by something better or that the first EO he will sign as a president will declare the existence of an impenetrable wall along the broaders which will make unnecesary the conttinuation of Trump's wall.
 
dex4974 said:
The left pretends a wall like that across our southern border would not actually mitigate illegal crossings and I think that's nonsense. What do you think?
Click to expand...
I think building an ugly expensive wall like that along the southern border is a waste of time and energy. We have more efficient ways to monitor the border.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom