- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
No Trump shouldn't discipline or prosecute Vindman. What he should do is fire him. Vindman along with a lot of others should have been fired first day.
Those who serve at the pleasure of the President serve at the pleasure of the President. If citizens dont like that pleasure then they know what to do.
No, although I imagine he'd think it was okay to try.
IMO removal from the NSC was sufficient. Just put the man (and his brother) "out-to-pasture" as a Division staff officer, or maybe at some recruiting command...and leave well-enough alone.
Seems like trying to shiv your Commander because he decides to not follow your advice should be a career ender.....
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Well this is kinda on Trump because he should have cleaned house a long time ago.
Well this is kinda on Trump because he should have cleaned house a long time ago.
Once again a Trumpster who sees it as okay for trump to violate the law AGAIN. Relatiation against Vindman violates the law, but of course you do not care if Trump does so and it shows.
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so.
He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww,
Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
Could/should this president or any preident order the military to dicipline someone for what is obviously political reasons. Vindman was subpoenaed to come to the House and testify. As a military officer he had no right to refuse and even the president could not stop him from doing so. He testified to what he heard on the phone call to the best of his ability and seemed to have no axe to grind. Now he has been removed from his position, which in itself violates the laww, but neither the president or the GOP care about the law. Now trump is suggesting that the military should bring charges against Vindman, for what, no one really knows. But Could or should this president go ahead and force by order the military to discipline Vindman or anyone?
There were Several very good reasons why he did not, one of them is that he had no idea how bad the swamp is, as he said in NH yesterday.
Another is that Trump took Newts advice to heart..... that if he took on all of Deep State all at the same time then he would have no chance......they have almost all the weapons...all he has are his voters....so he tried to play nice kinda.
LIke he drained the swamp, no I guess he filled the swamp with alligators and now most of his alligators are in jail. Thee GOP wants to impeach Obama. I guess they forgot he is out of office with a clean slate.
There were Several very good reasons why he did not, one of them is that he had no idea how bad the swamp is, as he said in NH yesterday.
Another is that Trump took Newts advice to heart..... that if he took on all of Deep State all at the same time then he would have no chance......they have almost all the weapons...all he has are his voters....so he tried to play nice kinda.
Trump didnt drain ****. Draining the swamp would have been mass firings. That is draining the swamp.
Those who serve at the pleasure of the President serve at the pleasure of the President. If citizens dont like that pleasure then they know what to do.
What law prevents Trump from retaliating against Vindman? Trump is the CiC of our armed forces and can request anything he wants within the limitations of the law. If Vindman violated the UCMJ, Yrump has every right to demand he is prosecuted. He also has every right to remove him from the WH staff.Actually there is something called the LAW. I know you trumpsters do not believe that trump is contained by the law, but he is and retaliating against Vindman violates the LAW. Even the president is suppossed to obey the laws of the country and swore he would when he became president, but neither you trumpsters or the GOP will hold him accountable, EVER. So yo uhave made him a dictator who does not have to follow the law, you should be proud of ruining this country's democracy.
Not only that but his management style is to surround himself with contray viewpoints. He probably viewed it as advantage to have people that disagree with him advising him.There were Several very good reasons why he did not, one of them is that he had no idea how bad the swamp is, as he said in NH yesterday.
Another is that Trump took Newts advice to heart..... that if he took on all of Deep State all at the same time then he would have no chance......they have almost all the weapons...all he has are his voters....so he tried to play nice kinda.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?