• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Correlation Does Not Imply Causation, Except When It Does

LowDown

Curmudgeon
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
14,185
Reaction score
8,767
Location
Houston
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Shot: New York Times Reporter Asks Sanders If He’s Sexist For Continuing To Run Against Hillary.

Double-shot: In San Francisco, Berniecrats lash out at media for calling nomination for Clinton*.

Chaser: US newspaper industry hollowed out by job losses.

In the 1920s, H.L. Mencken wrote, “It is the prime function of a really first-rate newspaper to serve as a sort of permanent opposition in politics.” Unfortunately, today’s media. which occasionally striking a Mencken-esque cynical pose, are simply Democrat activists with bylines, producing a near-uniform product in service of their party, too terrified to report any story that would reflect badly on it, and increasingly frequently going beyond journalism into SJW-land. While loss of advertising revenue party explains job losses, the faulty product the medium produces must also be taken into consideration.

Or as Jack Shafer warned at Slate in 2008, “Michael Crichton, Vindicated — His 1993 prediction of mass-media extinction now looks on target.”

Time was it was possible for a conservative to go to the New York Times and find the facts that supported his ideas because the NYT reported all the facts even if their analysis of them was slanted. That's no longer the case. They can no longer be trusted with the facts, so it becomes necessary to look elsewhere, and there is little product in the mainstream media that meets that need. So if you want to know why they lost a big chunk of their readership that would be part of the answer. It's increasingly just a sorry product produced according to the ideology prevalent in J-school, where they apparently think that lying to the masses in the service of their own idea of what is right is to be encouraged.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/235652-2/
 

Ikari

Moderator
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
80,880
Reaction score
48,964
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
The media has long been in the pocket of the Republocrat Party Structure. It's why you'll never hear about third parties. It's all "news-entertainment" now, designed to prevent and discourage thinking. Just throwing out the propaganda for the status quo and giving us the "topic of the week" to freak out about so we don't pay attention to the crap that the government is actually up to.
 

Cardinal

Respected on both sides
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
81,541
Reaction score
60,773
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Sexist to run against Hillary? That's a new one on me. Methinks the NYT needs to tighten it's hiring restrictions a wee bit.
 

Napoleon

DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
14,465
Reaction score
5,072
Location
Columbus, OH
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
The media has long been in the pocket of the Republocrat Party Structure. It's why you'll never hear about third parties. It's all "news-entertainment" now, designed to prevent and discourage thinking. Just throwing out the propaganda for the status quo and giving us the "topic of the week" to freak out about so we don't pay attention to the crap that the government is actually up to.

We don't hear about third parties because they're incredibly unorganized, don't do anything newsworthy, and they largely pick obscure people as their candidates. Keep it real. Most people dont know who tf the third party candidates are because they're mostly a motley crew of random people off the street who don't put their joints down long enough to campaign.
 

Patrickt

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 28, 2006
Messages
3,579
Reaction score
1,082
Location
Oaxaca, Mexico
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Time was it was possible for a conservative to go to the New York Times and find the facts that supported his ideas because the NYT reported all the facts even if their analysis of them was slanted. That's no longer the case. They can no longer be trusted with the facts, so it becomes necessary to look elsewhere, and there is little product in the mainstream media that meets that need. So if you want to know why they lost a big chunk of their readership that would be part of the answer. It's increasingly just a sorry product produced according to the ideology prevalent in J-school, where they apparently think that lying to the masses in the service of their own idea of what is right is to be encouraged.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/235652-2/

Not in my lifetime but I'm only 75. The New York Times was honest when they changed their masthead from "All the news that's fit, we print" to "All the news that fits, we print."
 
Top Bottom