• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Corporation for Public Broadcasting Will Shut Down

You know, I take it all back. I've been thinking about it. And what they're saying on NPR about this harming rural people is probably true.

If my old uncle Jasper and Aunt Irma cain't (sic) tune into "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me" on the long ride home back from church, it might just kill them.
 
Yep, NPR only gets 1% of its budget from the federal government. If NPR can’t survive without that 1%, something is seriously wrong.
NPR will survive.

NPR in major markets it will survive.

In rural markets where it needs to be subsidized it will operate under diminished service.
 
NPR will survive.

NPR in major markets it will survive.

In rural markets where it needs to be subsidized it will operate under diminished service.
They probably only have to last until the next administration, honestly.
 
No, a free press can be supported with some limited support, as we were doing.
Couldn't the tiny amount of difference also be made up by all the gigantic corporations and foundations that fund 90 plus percent of the rest of public broadcasting?
 
Couldn't the tiny amount of difference also be made up by all the gigantic corporations and foundations that fund 90 plus percent of the rest of public broadcasting?
I think that the particular shows are underwritten by corporations.

The individual PBS and NPR stations then choose what shows to purchase and air.

The budget cuts will likely affect local coverage because doing local TV costs money and there isn’t a national audience for it.
 
Oh no what will people do when they don't get to see elmo. Oh wait I forgot it's not a 1989 they can use the internet
All this might be valid if the money went somewhere except tax cuts for the already ridiculously rich.

We are all just resources to them. We exist to facilitate their game of who can be the richest most powerful.

It’s only a matter of time before we have poorhouses and indenture and company stores.

It’s the pattern of history. Those who cannot ever get enough feed their jones until they wreck the societies they operate in.

Then the cycle starts all over again.
 
As opposed to tax cuts for folks that do not need them, just want them?

Thats where all the money is going. Or more accurately allows the tax cuts to be given by congress.
 
The rich got richer when the top bracket was 90%.

Just not as fast.
 
Okay, I'm trying to follow you here. So we're talking about the very last mile into the tundra where they have nothing but NPR? And they're going to starve to death because they don't have morning-edition and fresh air?

Starve? No..I mean there is one town that only gets supplies via boat when the ice melts but thats not this.
And if you're talking about emergency broadcast type stuff, there are no other radio stations, no weather radio that reaches up there?

Apparently they use public broadcast for weather and alerts
I don't know a lot about rural Alaska, but I just can't see how this Will increase their danger there that much if at all.

if you rely on somethings for weather and shit you cant see that.



Let me give you an example. I used to live in a more rural part of pa. Like my house was a compete dead zone cell wise. About 5 to 7 years ago that changed. Im an hour away from a major city.

So you are telling me they couldn't fund that type of shit. Sure whatever about npr atm. But a safety system is fractions of a penny.
 
As opposed to tax cuts for folks that do not need them, just want them?
I would say the middle class needs tax cuts
Thats where all the money is going. Or more accurately allows the tax cuts to be given by congress.
Tax cuts isn't money going anywhere that's just not taking it. The money taxpayers earn is theirs they earned it.
 

It’s part of the plan to control the news and certainly at local levels. Cut off local news and control national news sources, which the have already begun to do. Control the news and it is easier to pimp propaganda on the way to fascism. Part of the process.

Look at what Orban, MAGA demigod, has done and is doing.
 
I would say the middle class needs tax cuts

Tax cuts isn't money going anywhere that's just not taking it. The money taxpayers earn is theirs they earned it.
Trump is raising middle class taxes. His tariffs are the largest tax increase in decades.

Also, the debt keeps increasing, because he’s just funneling the money saved to his billionaire donors.
 
All this might be valid if the money went somewhere except tax cuts for the already ridiculously rich.
Money doesn't go to tax cuts you don't give somebody money when you don't take it from them.

That would be like saying everyday I get given all the money in my wallet because nobody mugs me
We are all just resources to them. We exist to facilitate their game of who can be the richest most powerful.
And if you don't ask for compensation for what you do for them that's your fault that's not slavery because you're volunteering.
It’s only a matter of time before we have poorhouses and indenture and company stores.
That can only happen through government Force at cannot happen through capitalism that's not how capitalism works
It’s the pattern of history. Those who cannot ever get enough feed their jones until they wreck the societies they operate in.

Then the cycle starts all over again.
Yet here we are in the most wealthy country on the planet with the fewest people in poverty global definition none the US definition and that's because of capitalism.
 
Trump is raising middle class taxes. His tariffs are the largest tax increase in decades.
But it's one you can opt out of. Essentially it's a voluntary tax versus theft thank you Trump that's exactly what I voted for.
Also, the debt keeps increasing, because he’s just funneling the money saved to his billionaire donors.
Where do you get this idea that the government gives the money to billionaires it's the other way around.
 
It’s part of the plan to control the news and certainly at local levels. Cut off local news and control national news sources,
I'm sorry to break it to you it's already controlled it has been for decades. Sinclair LLC already owns most local broadcasts in the affiliates that sponsor them. It's already controlled by a corporation and it has been since 71. They changed their name from Chesapeake television corporation to Sinclair broadcasting in 1985 so everything you've ever watched was curated for you since 71.
which the have already begun to do. Control the news and it is easier to pimp propaganda on the way to fascism. Part of the process.
Well there was something in place that made it illegal to propagandize to the Americans called the Smith mundt act. Obama nullified that. That's why nobody trusts news anymore because they're all liars.
Look at what Orban, MAGA demigod, has done and is doing.
I think you're missing the picture here the smith-mundt ACT needs to be reinstated
 
CNN requires you to accept cookies? It didn’t for me. How odd.
Maybe CNN already has your cookies.

Edit; I found what I believe you are referring to in a NY Times article.
Berliner (who now works for a questionable right wing “information source”) is entitled to his opinion.

His opinion is just that though.
 
Last edited:
Money doesn't go to tax cuts you don't give somebody money when you don't take it from them.

That would be like saying everyday I get given all the money in my wallet because nobody mugs me
Except that the change in revenue is just as real.

It's more like saying a cut in pay wouldn't hurt you because you're not spending any different.
 
Except that the change in revenue is just as real.
Yes just like if the person that held you at gunpoint demands money from you and you don't have any he doesn't get the revenue.
It's more like saying a cut in pay wouldn't hurt you because you're not spending any different.
No I cut and paste is your exchanging your time and labor for money the government isn't giving you anything it's just stealing.
 
So propaganda should only be for profit?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…