We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
I strongly suspect there will be an upward revision in the number of deaths, right now we can't really test corpses due to a lack of capacity so statisticians will need to tackle that in the future.
This post won’t age well.
You’ll see by...the end of this week.
We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
You do realize that if it is 22000 deaths, that woudl be in addition to the flu deaths, and that if it is that amount, it would be because of teh social distancing, rather that despite it? IT would reduce the numbers drastically.
We will both see. If your prediction that I will "see" doesn't pan out by the "end of this week", then can we go back to work next week?
Sure. Go ahead.
The Italians are not having just another in a series of ' bad flu seasons'.We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
I can't. I can't reopen the restaurants and stores now.
I'm not sure you quite get the magnitude of what our pretty governor has done. He's shut down the entire state. How many people will lose their businesses or get evicted because they can't pay the rent? How many of them will die? It's impossible to say, but the longer this goes on, the higher it will be.
I highly doubt that. So far, it's just a few thousand people in a country of 330 million people. What's that, about 0.0001% My concern is whether we might overinflate the stats. Say someone with a heart condition or lung cancer dies from the Chinese Flu - is that a death from the disease or was the disease just the thing that pushed them over the edge? I don't know how the CDC counts such things, but there may be a powerful political push to try to inflate the numbers as much as possible to justify the draconian economy-wrecking policies in place now.
Whatever it is, at some point we're going to have to restart the US economy and live - or not - with the consequences.
The Italians are not having just another in a series of ' bad flu seasons'.
Balance that by the number we CAN know, the death toll.
Short term economic pain is worth avoiding the massive deaths that would result from doing nothing.
There are already people looking at it and thinking we have been undercounting
Uncounted among coronavirus victims, deaths sweep through Italy's nursing homes - Reuters
The death rate in Italy is nor going to double or treble.
Italy is actually a good example of my earlier point. They count anyone who died with the virus as having died FROM the virus. Even if they have a host of other health problems. They are inflating the deaths from this.
And the US in not Italy.
Gori said there had been 164 deaths in his town in the first two weeks of March this year, of which 31 were attributed to the coronavirus. That compares with 56 deaths over the same period last year.
Even adding the 31 coronavirus deaths to that total would leave 77 additional deaths, an increase that suggests the virus may have caused significantly more deaths than officially recorded.
Even if it's "no higher than the flu" it is more contagious and there's no immunity in the population. The flu is the 8th leading cause of death in the country. You can't simply double that in the span of weeks and expect the system to be able to handle it.We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
We still don't know the overall mortality rate. We know how many people are dying, but we don't know how many are infected. It could be a year or more before we know.
If this turns out to be a giant dud, and the mortality rate turns out to be no higher than a particularly bad flu season, then the backlash against the draconian measures and economy-destroying closures could be earthshaking.
Social distancing is one thing. Shutting down large swaths of the entire economy is another.
I don't know how the CDC counts such things, but there may be a powerful political push to try to inflate the numbers as much as possible to justify the draconian economy-wrecking policies in place now.
Which means you missed what the article was saying.
Lets say half of those are coronavirus after an autopsy, that still doubles the rate in this case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?