• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cops tase 11 year old (1 Viewer)


Greetings, Barnacle. :2wave:

You must have access to information that the rest of us don't have since you know what food she stole, which you indicate are "snacks." All I am saying is that in too many places in this country, schools have been sending food home in backpacks so children will have something to eat over the weekend - they apparently keep them fed during the week. A new school year will be starting soon.....

I agree with Hawkeye10 when he argues that we used to do better as a country than what we're reading about now - in so many ways! Sad.......
 

Probably some silver-tongued prosecutor, skilled in the art of sophistry and deception....
 
Cincinnati police officer on 'restricted duty' after allegedly tasing 11-year-old girl


More than 1000 people in the US have died since 2000 from being tasered.

In addition, it can be very dicey if the taser barbs enter the spinal column. That usually requires a trip to the ER and sometimes a surgeon's expertise to remove the barbs.
 

When you say she had it coming and no more, that functions as a defense of the officer. And what you posted boiled down to she had it coming. (That's especially true where nobody said she didn't do anything wrong). You end up repeating it here, talking about the "choices" she made.

The choices she made were wrong and she should be punished. But she's also an 11 year old and she was tazed by the police which is absolutely ridiculous.



If an officer is too unfit or scared or whatever to deal with a little child running away, that person should either be behind desk or not an officer at all.
 

I said she made the choices that led to the event. I never said she "had it coming."
 
Greetings, Rogue Valley. :2wave:

WHY would an 11-year old girl steal FOOD? Doesn't this bother people? It would be different if she stole some clothing from a department store, but FOOD? I could cry that she was tasered - :thumbdown:

Hi polgara :2wave:

There are different reasons for stealing food (such as a dare, barter, etc), but the most common reason is hunger itself.

Hunger doesn't justify the theft, but it does make it more understandable. Maybe there is no breadwinner at home?
 
I said she made the choices that led to the event. I never said she "had it coming."

Oh FFS. I never said you said she "had it coming" in quotes. I said that your post "boiled down to" it. And I'm not the only one who read your comments in the same valid way. See the last page of this thread.



I'm honestly having a hard time believing you don't understand how it is that when you pop into a thread about cops tasering an 11 year old, a thread in which nobody is claiming the kid did nothing wrong, and you choose to say things boiling down to saying she had it coming

Reread what you wrote to yourself:

"This is an other perfect example of what my sig says. She made the choices to shoplift and to run from the police, and she has to live with the consequences of those choices. Hopefully, she will make different choices in the future as she grows up.

Don't want to get tased? Don't run from the cops. Don't want to be put in a situation where you feel you may get arrested, convicted, and go to jail? Don't break the law. It's that simple. "




Gee, let's see. Focus on her "choices to shoplift", to run, and saying she has to "live with those consequences."

Say "Don't want to get tased? Don't run from the cops."


But that doesn't boil down to saying she had it coming? I'm unfairly characterizing what you said? Please.Of all people, I wouldn't expect such stupidly dishonest game-playing from you. Yes, she had it coming is exactly what your post boiled down to.
 




He read your post exactly the same way I did. He just didn't respond as forcefully.

:shrug:
 
btw, I've always liked the white caps of the Cincinnati PD.

 

We're not talking about a kid with a gun pointed at a cop. We're talking about an 11 year old girl, and I do not think an officer who is physically incapable of controlling a kid that age should be on the street, whether it's age, weight, or whatever cause.

(Of course, if it was just laziness and the cop didn't want to run, that's even worse)
 
Greetings, Rogue Valley. :2wave:

WHY would an 11-year old girl steal FOOD? Doesn't this bother people? It would be different if she stole some clothing from a department store, but FOOD? I could cry that she was tasered - :thumbdown:

Easy there Aladdin!

 

That's why I find this situation unacceptable.

That doesn't mean that I can't imagine a scenario in which a cop will have to taser an 11-year-old girl.
 


Yes; I have access to special information ... my access code is: google

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...eploy-taser-11-year-old-shoplifter/929492002/
 
"Police said body cameras were not turned on during this incident."

Or recordings were erased...

or it was poor reporting


but hey lets jump to the tin foil conspiracies first :shrug:
 

Someone can't tell a tongue-in-cheek remark from serious argument.

The problem is that the police tazed a little girl, a potentially fatal move. And they did it because they either could not or were too lazy to run after her. Shouldn't someone ostensibly concerned about government abuse of power be concerned about government agents tazing little kids?
 

govt abuse of power by Kroger? thats a new one. Im obviously bad at this, are you still joking or trying to make a serious argument?
 
Anywho, since Crovax over there started talking about "tinfoil conspiracies", do people really believe that police never do something like "not turn on" bodycams when approaching certain situations? Never have curiously convenient "malfunctions"?

There are any number of cases where police have forgotten to do either and accidentally recorded themselves planting evidence on people, even with a dash cam. (Or they didn't notice a security camera that got it). There are any number of cases where police are recorded beating or shooting someone, which recording contradicts the initial public story.

Remember the one where the guy ran from his car, was shot dead in his back, and the cop was recorded by a bystander planting a gun nearby the body?

Probably not. Probably demand a link and jump thread if provided.





I honestly don't know what it is about certain political philosophies that seems to demand automatically defending cops. That's especially true if this 'philosophy' involves praising law and order, and distrusting the government's power. Shouldn't adherents be particularly concerned about misbehaving cops, seeing as the ones that misbehave are violating law & order, are abusing government power, are making a bad name for others?
 
govt abuse of power by Kroger? thats a new one. Im obviously bad at this, are you still joking or trying to make a serious argument?

Unless the cop that tazed the girl is named "Kroger", that's the dumbest attempt to seem witty I've ever seen here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…