**** that child molesting piece of scum...... Wait...... They already did. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Article is here.
I may be in the minority here, but from my perspective if the state is going to create institutions within which it will house those who have committed crimes against society then those institutions should be governed by the laws of that society. If an inmate, regardless of how heinous the crime, is assaulted while in the care and custody of a state institution then that state institution bears some responsibility for the assault if the victim did not invite or otherwise cause the assault. It should be no different a matter of principle than if a citizen walked into a police station and the custodians of that station allowed circumstances whereby that citizen was assaulted. To believe otherwise is to believe that a sentence handed down by a jury and judge is insufficient punishment and anyone convicted is no longer entitled to human dignity.
How could it possibly bring a smile to your face? Rape is ALWAYS disgusting.
I would like to know how many of these prison rape proponents consider themselves 'Christians.'
The last part. The sentence was insufficient and it is being rectified by the inmates...
The idea that he is getting justice can bring a smile to your face...
Not me... I consider myself better than Christians.
Bod, the guy wants a civil suit in which he'll ask for a lot of money that he knows that he'll never get. I'm thinking after the money is off the table he'll attempt to negotiate for a 250 refill prescription of Valium to ease his anxiety while he's being raped for the next 20 years. He might want to consider negotiating for some KY to go with the Valium.
Yep... sucks to be that guy.
**** that child molesting piece of scum...... Wait...... They already did. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Article is here.
Yeah...truly. It'd really suck if his inmates would rape him twice on Sundays...you know to be christian about it.
Bod, the guy wants a civil suit in which he'll ask for a lot of money that he knows that he'll never get. I'm thinking after the money is off the table he'll attempt to negotiate for a 250 refill prescription of Valium to ease his anxiety while he's being raped for the next 20 years. He might want to consider negotiating for some KY to go with the Valium.
And you made yourself a part of itThe last page or so of this thread is sociopathic filth.
Sure they are. They voluntarily committed a crime. If they chose not to commit a crime, they wouldn't be in jail. But you already knew that, and knew what I meant. No, I didn't agree with you. Try again?
By the way, the reason I'm not posting from jail is I decided not to do something that will end up causing me to be sent to prison. See how that works?
By the way, go down to your nearest prison and demand that they be released. You seem to have a problem with people in prison. Maybe you can volunteer your house for the people who voluntarily commit crimes, then there would be nothing to worry about.
Well the ultimate solution is the isolation of all prisoners, however, that would be costly and harmful to most of them in the long run. What could be a solution is if you are found to have raped someone in prison you are then placed in isolation the rest of your stay. It wouldn't "solve" the first rape problem but it may serve as an incentive not rape someone.
I'm ok with punishment, please stop lying about my arguments. I was merely saying that being in jail isn't voluntary. You seem to agree, though you won't say it, because you wouldn't want the doors of prison flung open because the criminals would leave to commit crimes. Why? Because they were not in jail voluntarily.
It IS a good idea for most when using the "One strike" rule. Then they may think twice before doing it again. Yes it's enforceable, if the strike is proven.
There isn't enough room as is, and selecting for the rapists would eventually get you a huge contained and pissed rapist population. What could go wrong there?
What about those who advocate denying others their human rights?Those who deny others their human rights don't deserve any themselves.
She arguing above your argument-you are saying that jail isn't voluntary. I dont think thats news to anybody-but she's discussing the "why?" to your "what".
The fact that you think a prison should work like this makes me sick.
Suppose short eyes says to his cell mate: "I'm going to sue the State and the prison for having been raped by you three times. Just say that you didn't do it. Don't say anything else and I'll split the money with you."
you are right about that and however saying homosexlty itself is wrong is rather bigoted
Or maybe they are in love and need money for their honeymoon.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?