Careful there. You spent some pages acting like even arguing about it is stupid, but there you are arguing about it in the end. So if you think that, you can only think arguing it either way is what is stupid. Otherwise, you're doing the thing you condemn for the reason you condemn it.
Naturally, as I pointed out, there's always the looming issue this gets to in the background: if Trump constantly says false things, then it's worth talking about why that is, which in turn results in arguments with people insisting that what Trump said is true,
View attachment 67247175
View attachment 67247176
View attachment 67247177
"Walls"? No, and not if you put a few bricks under them. Where I grew up, these would be considered easily defeated fences. And I really doubt that the various mix of urban/suburban environments would be considered tough neighborhoods....
So yeah? Stupid fight. Stupid like someone insisting 2+2=5. But it is hard to resist telling that person what you think of their argument because you're thinking "holy **** is he serious?"
Except, it's stupider, because as was pointed out .....
someone's fence, required or not, around their house is 100% irrelevant to the wall Trump wants. Right? It just doesn't compare. Yet Trump was using it to compare, while also being wrong. Again.
And again and again to the 10th.
That is worth talking about.