Devils.High
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- NJ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
During WWII people had to give up money, cloths, and freedom to go to the war. People had victory gardens to help support the soldiers, today what do people do for war relief? Not much, and today my history teacher asked me what would I give up for the war? I said not much, even though it sounds very insensitive, but he stated how those people are not willing to help themselves. So my conclusion is that if the people do not want to help themselves why should I risk my fellow Americans and my own life to help people who do not want to help them? I also stated how if society does not want to change, we cannot make them change. If they keep on endangering Americas life why can we not just bomb them? It sounds insensitive, I know. But I'm just looking out for myself. If someone was doing something wrong to people around me and it effected me, I would do something about it. AQ is very strong, i understand that but I still think people for their own life should help us. I would not feel bad at all going into war, if I knew it was for a cause and I could help a whole society because there are some bad people in it; I would help stop them. I wouldn't let a couple of people endanger my life and people around me that I care about them. Those are just my views, but do they seem a little too inhumane? Because I sort of think they are, I would just like to know if thats wrong morally or not.