- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 6,914
- Reaction score
- 3,673
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Only in front of Congress. Does that count?
Apparently not to Hillary supporters. It's a witch hunt I tell you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only in front of Congress. Does that count?
Μολὼν λαβέ;1066075362 said:Apparently not to Hillary supporters. It's a witch hunt I tell you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comey testified under oath there were classified emails on her server, Hillary said there weren't.
Who are you going to believe? It can't be both.
It is much more than 3 documents.
Go back and listen to Comey say how many emails contained classified or confidential information at the time she sent them.
This things has been hashed.....rehashed.....rerehashed.....rererehashed and rerererehashed. It reeks of desperation. Republicans tend to keep searching for things that aren't there....maybe they are better off searching for another blowjob....nah....they'll probably just try to rehash Benghazi for the 15, 632nd time.
Right, but they weren't marked. They were products of possibly classified discussions. Showing she KNEW they were classified is the problem, legally speaking.
The presence of classified emails on Clinton's server wasn't definitely known until last weeks Comey findings were released.
yawn........please come up with something new.
The classified headings had been stripped, but paragraphs in the emails that were classified had the (C) designation preceding the paragraph.
We are talking about a couple paragraphs buried down in three emails out of tens of thousands.
Those 3 emails you mention were part of the 30,000 that her attorneys deleted. The FBI was only able to reconstruct a small number of those 30,000, so we really don't know how many of those deleted emails contained classified data.
Link?
There won't be a link. Its a lie.
Comey's findings were new.
Not really....same old bull
Not really....same old bull ****...despite their repeated attempts to refer to everything as "new information". The fact that they kept referring to everything as "new information" was the first clue that their talking points were an attempt to try to convince people that it wasn't just regurgitated garbage.....a failed attempt however.
State: Some classified markings in Clinton emails were 'human error' - POLITICO
Some of you guys really suck at consuming information.
This has been known for a week now.
Then you never read the Freedom Of Information Act.
She used the server for official business as a government official/employee.
She destroyed how many emails prior to approval?
State: Some classified markings in Clinton emails were 'human error' - POLITICO
Some of you guys really suck at consuming information.
This has been known for a week now.
This is different than what you had stated.
And as I've said numerous times now...
Of those three -improperly marked - classified, they could have been sent via US mail with a No. 10 envelope and simple first class postage stamp -- that's it. delivery via USPS and 45 cent stamp.Even with the proper classified markings - if they had been classified as (c) Confidential ...
Per the law.
Mighty secure, eh?