• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Congressman Tells How Israel Lobby AIPAC Smeared Him as Anti-Semitic for Voting Against Iraq War

munkle

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
293
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed


Saying that Israel and the Israeli lobbying group AIPAC considered the US invasion of the Middle East a top priority, Virginia Congressman Jim Moran describes how he refused to bow to AIPAC's demand that he vote for the war, for which he was then subjected to a campaign portraying him as anti-semitic.

The overthrow of Saddam and other Arab governments has been a goal of Israel for decades, articulated in the paper by Oded Yinon entitled "A Strategy or Israel for the Nineteen Eighties." Yinon wrote:

"Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel."


In 1996 future Defense Department officials of the Bush administration published a paper intended as a policy guide for Israeli prime minister Netanyahu, "A Clean Break," which echoed Oded Yinon's call for Iraq, Syria, and other Arab governments to be overthrown, a task which could only be accomplished by American forces. The primary author was David Wurmser, Middle East Adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney. Another co-author was Douglas Feith, Bush's under secretary of Defense for Policy. Wurmser wrote:

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions."​

On September 4, 2004, the Washington Post reported that FBI counterintelligence investigators had questioned Wurmser, along with Douglas Feith, Harold Rhode, and Paul Wolfowitz about the passing of classified information to Ahmad Chalabi and/or the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

AIPAC has taken great pains to conceal its role in lobbying for the Iraq War. Marshall Wittmann, AIPAC’s communications director, told the New York Times (as reported in a Lobelog.com expose' )

“To remove any misinformation or confusion, AIPAC took no position whatsoever on the Iraq war, nor did we lobby on this issue — this is an entirely false and misleading argument.”​

Watch the full documentary "How Israel partisans buy U.S. elections"


More on AIPAC lobbying for the Iraq War:


AIPAC and Iraq, by Matt Iglesias, The Atlantic
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the video. It is certainly known to me that Israel was a staunch supporter and advocate of the disastrous Iraq war, whilst being utterly indifferent to the steep price its 'closest ally' would pay to fulfill it's regional ambitions, but I was not aware of this specific instance of disingenuous political pressure.
 
Thanks for the video. It is certainly known to me that Israel was a staunch supporter and advocate of the disastrous Iraq war, whilst being utterly indifferent to the steep price its 'closest ally' would pay to fulfill it's regional ambitions, but I was not aware of this specific instance of disingenuous political pressure.

AIPAC supported it brutally behind the scenes while denying it had a position in public Now why would Israel not want Americans to know it wanted to use the American army to overthrow one of its greatest foes? The US was ok with Saddam for decades. He was a secular ruler who maintained stability, and provided a counterweight to Iran. Makes no sense unless you are planning to use the American Army to decimate Iran too.
 
In all fairness to our faux ally Israel...

...the US needs no particular push to pursue brutal regime change anywhere in the world.
 
In all fairness to our faux ally Israel...

...the US needs no particular push to pursue brutal regime change anywhere in the world.

As is being carried out by the democratic coup underway right here at home.
 
In all fairness to our faux ally Israel...

...the US needs no particular push to pursue brutal regime change anywhere in the world.

True...
 
Back
Top Bottom