• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Companies Conservtives should not support - please add your suggestions

NoLeftNoRight

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
1,578
Reaction score
418
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
Supporting these firms is supporting the Leftist, Globalist agenda.
If you patronize these organizations, or don't care....you aren't really concerned about Americas future or the Constitution


I'll start off with Starbucks...

1). Starbucks

News - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban (displacing 10,000 Americans from work) link below

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda and is proud of it - even though profiting wildly off the American way
Proof - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban | Fox Business
 
Supporting these firms is supporting the Leftist, Globalist agenda.
If you patronize these organizations, or don't care....you aren't really concerned about Americas future or the Constitution


I'll start off with Starbucks...

1). Starbucks

News - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban (displacing 10,000 Americans from work) link below

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda and is proud of it - even though profiting wildly off the American way
Proof - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban | Fox Business

That's a bit misleading, how can 10K Americans be displaced if this is happening in 75 countries over 5 years? Did you check your own link?

As for the nature of the thread, I don't boycott.
 
Supporting these firms is supporting the Leftist, Globalist agenda.
If you patronize these organizations, or don't care....you aren't really concerned about Americas future or the Constitution


I'll start off with Starbucks...

1). Starbucks

News - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban (displacing 10,000 Americans from work) link below

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda and is proud of it - even though profiting wildly off the American way
Proof - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban | Fox Business

I would think that since libs claim to be for poor working class Americans that they should also boycott the business as well.After all according the title this is screwing Americans out of a job.
 
Last edited:
Open borders and a global economy is a 'Communists agenda'? LOL

Someday, but probably not in my lifetime, a Conservative will finally get it right when they use the terms Socialism or Communism. They never, ever get it right. NEVER!

When it comes to economics Conservatives haven't a freaking clue.
 
Supporting these firms is supporting the Leftist, Globalist agenda.
If you patronize these organizations, or don't care....you aren't really concerned about Americas future or the Constitution


I'll start off with Starbucks...

1). Starbucks

News - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban (displacing 10,000 Americans from work) link below

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda and is proud of it - even though profiting wildly off the American way
Proof - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban | Fox Business

I wonder where they'll find 10,000 refugees who can speak English. Or perhaps they will hire them in their Syrian stores. Oh, wait...
 
Open borders and a global economy is a 'Communists agenda'? LOL

Someday, but probably not in my lifetime, a Conservative will finally get it right when they use the terms Socialism or Communism. They never, ever get it right. NEVER!

When it comes to economics Conservatives haven't a freaking clue.

He said Leftist Globalist Agenda. Who said anything about Communists?
 
He said Leftist Globalist Agenda. Who said anything about Communists?

HE DID!!! From the Original Post.

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda

So explain how open borders is in anyway a 'Communist agenda'? Communism actually promotes the opposite. The Russians built a wall in Berlin to keep their people IN. That's hardly 'open'.
 
Supporting these firms is supporting the Leftist, Globalist agenda.
If you patronize these organizations, or don't care....you aren't really concerned about Americas future or the Constitution


I'll start off with Starbucks...

1). Starbucks

News - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban (displacing 10,000 Americans from work) link below

Reason - Supports open borders, the Communist agenda and is proud of it - even though profiting wildly off the American way
Proof - Starbucks CEO Schultz Plans to Hire 10,000 Refugees After Trump Ban | Fox Business

I only boycott those companies who's products I don't need or want.
 
Open borders and a global economy is a 'Communists agenda'? LOL

Someday, but probably not in my lifetime, a Conservative will finally get it right when they use the terms Socialism or Communism. They never, ever get it right. NEVER!

When it comes to economics Conservatives haven't a freaking clue.

The terms have becoming shiny baubles to excite and inflame people who wouldn't care about their actual meaning in the first place.
 
Open borders and a global economy is a 'Communists agenda'? LOL

Someday, but probably not in my lifetime, a Conservative will finally get it right when they use the terms Socialism or Communism. They never, ever get it right. NEVER!

When it comes to economics Conservatives haven't a freaking clue.

No... you prefer a very limited definition of Socialist.

Obama was the definition of an economic illiterate. What fool tells companies "now is not the time for profits"? A socialist, one with no experience in the private sector, and no clue about business.

Those who followed the fool, are themselves fools.
 
No... you prefer a very limited definition of Socialist.

Obama was the definition of an economic illiterate. What fool tells companies "now is not the time for profits"? A socialist, one with no experience in the private sector, and no clue about business.

Those who followed the fool, are themselves fools.


I figure you are disdtorting what Obama said on purpose which suggests you are a kremlin troll.. RealClearPolitics - Politics Nation - Obama: "Now Is Not The Time" For Excessive Bonuses
 
"now is not the time for profits"? A socialist,

Thanks for proving my point that Conservatives don't have an F'ing clue when it comes to economics. You throw the words Socialist and Communist out there just to try and scare your fellow uninformed, ignorant about economics Cons.

My God man, you are either being paid to spew this nonsense, or you are beyond clueless.
 
Thanks for proving my point that Conservatives don't have an F'ing clue when it comes to economics. You throw the words Socialist and Communist out there just to try and scare your fellow uninformed, ignorant about economics Cons.

My God man, you are either being paid to spew this nonsense, or you are beyond clueless.

I know Socialists like to hide behind the strict definition of "socialist"... but when someone foments Socialist legistlation and pines for Socialist legistlation at every turn... one can call them Socialists.

Obama is also an economic illiterate, which is a seeming prerequisite for being a Socialist. 100-years ago, not so much, but today... with all the evidence illustrating the abject failure of Socialist legistlation wherever it has been tried... you have to be deaf, dumb and blind to embrace the idiocy.

Now... pour vous:

attachment.php


attachment.php


ROTFLOL...
 
I know Socialists like to hide behind the strict definition of "socialist"... but when someone foments Socialist legistlation and pines for Socialist legistlation at every turn... one can call them Socialists.

Obama is also an economic illiterate, which is a seeming prerequisite for being a Socialist. 100-years ago, not so much, but today... with all the evidence illustrating the abject failure of Socialist legistlation wherever it has been tried... you have to be deaf, dumb and blind to embrace the idiocy.

Now... pour vous:

attachment.php


attachment.php


ROTFLOL...


why not come clean and be honest are your posts trump trolls or kremlin trolls?
 
I figure you are disdtorting what Obama said on purpose which suggests you are a kremlin troll.. RealClearPolitics - Politics Nation - Obama: "Now Is Not The Time" For Excessive Bonuses

This may better illustrate.

I do think at a certain point you have made enough money.



Statements like that seem to at least lean away from capitalism. "Enough" has nothing to do with it. "Need" has nothing to do with it.

From each according to their means? To each according to their needs?
 
nope, you are just plain posting foolishness

Those were Obama's words.

I agree, they're foolish. The man revealed he is an economic illiterate.

His comments about the Cap Gaims tax was also rich.

His "laser-like focus on the economy... Hahahahahahaha... absurd.
 
why not come clean and be honest are your posts trump trolls or kremlin trolls?

You obviously have no answer to the post.

Oh! Yes... Congratulations. Busted. I'm a Kremlin plant. Started here 8-years ago as part of a pro-American Master Plan initiated by Medvedev.

You folks are obviously lost... but you're funny when you're lost.

Please keep posting.
 
Those were Obama's words.

I agree, they're foolish. The man revealed he is an economic illiterate.

His comments about the Cap Gaims tax was also rich.

His "laser-like focus on the economy... Hahahahahahaha... absurd.


you distorted what he said. typical dishonest post. classic kremlin basement foolishness.
 
why not come clean and be honest are your posts trump trolls or kremlin trolls?

He has to be 1 or the other.

Unless he is really this ignorant about economics and politics, and/or he's just plain dishonest. I hate to believe that about anyone, but I guess it is possible.
 
He has to be 1 or the other.

Unless he is really this ignorant about economics and politics, and/or he's just plain dishonest. I hate to believe that about anyone, but I guess it is possible.


when you google putins trolls they are everywhere
 
Personally, I dont have the time nor desire to keep track of all the moronic **** different people, corporate execs, politicians, actors, etc do to use as a schedule to run my life. If I want coffee, I'll go to Duncan Donuts or the good ole 7-11, because frankly I prefer their coffee. But sometimes I do go to the Starbucks drive thru and when I do I always pay for the person behind me.

Its different if its a local business. But even then, it depends. We can disagree and people even have the right to put their money behind their opinion. Why would I boycott someone for having values and standards that are different from mine? I respect them for at least being consistent in their application.
 
Back
Top Bottom