• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Communist Party goes all in for Hillary...

WAKE UP


/////////////////////////

Church Growth Soaring in China


In a country where once Christian Believers had to hide in underground churches, now China has an estimated 58 million Protestants and nine million Catholics, the second largest Christian population in Asia. The Chinese government has taken notice of China’s church growth as numbers of Christians continue to soar, and, according to The Economist, “Many experts, foreign and Chinese, now accept that there are probably more Christians than there are members of the 87-million strong Communist Party.”

Religions LOVE to inflate their numbers...and "Christians" are no exception. (and I put "Christian" in quote marks because the overwhelming majority of those who claim to be Christian, are not in fact Christian)

That said, there's about 244 million Buddhists in China.

*yawn*
 
Commies have only killed 100's of millions of people worldwide, but nah, they ain't haters. LMAO

Are you that gullible?

Really? Have the members of the communist party of the USA killed 100's of millions of people worldwide? I wasn't aware of that. :roll:

We are talking about the current members of the communist party in the US and compared to the KKK/Nazi's they are not the haters, that is the reality. That you try and take things into consideration that happened outside of the US and decades ago is up to you, but for me it is ridiculous to claim that CPUSA voters are "haters". They may be ideological fools but that is not the same thing as being a hater.
 
This is my issue with socdems. Besides the fact that they are hardly discernable from American liberals in that they love capitalism and never critique it as a structure and that they don't give a **** about the global south. And they take at face value fallacious ideas about "human nature" as being static throughout humanity rather than something that is shaped by an individuals material reality

There is nothing wrong in itself with capitalism, as long as it is not done at the expense of the employees or done by unsavory enrichment among the top brass and austerity for the rest of the company.

Sure social democracy is not comparable to communism and I am thankful for that. And sorry, but social democrats try to better "human nature" by appealing to it and making sure that nobody gets left behind (by having a good social network to catch those who could fall through the cracks). And of course human nature is shaped through the times we live in, but you cannot forcibly reshape that, it has to be done through showing a better path and not through ideological theories that are straight jacketed onto an unresponsive humanity because they do not feel at home in that straight jacketed ideology that is communism.

Communism might have a sympathetic feel for some things but it is woefully out of touch with the reality of our world and the nature of people. And you cannot change that nature by force of by living in a communist nation (it has been tried and failed miserably).
 

The difference is the Communists are one with the modern Left... Nazi's... Leftist by their origination (National Socialists) have no ties to the Republican Party.

We don't support them, and share no common platform. That cannot be said about the communists... The modern Left embraces much of the ideology.
 
I wouldn't call the CPUSA a hate group. Oh - they hate capitalism, and you may hate them, and the Soviet CP hated us. But I don't see them as a hate group.

Now the Nazi's? Yeah, they hate. And we hate them, too! :thumbs:

They, like the modern Left, are simply demented.
 
That would matter maybe if I cared at all about the "wellbeing and existence of the United States" and your post wasn't an attempt to make the US's existence non-ideological. You think communists or anyone for that matter might have reasons that they are anti-US? You know, maybe intervention in their home countries and the murder of their leaders? Or meddling in their economies? Come on

Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot intervention was "bad" when the US did it. It's "good" when the Soviet Union is doing it, right?

If you don't get care so much, why not move to a communist country like China or North Korea? See how things really work there.
 
The difference is the Communists are one with the modern Left... Nazi's... Leftist by their origination (National Socialists) have no ties to the Republican Party.

We don't support them, and share no common platform. That cannot be said about the communists... The modern Left embraces much of the ideology.

Which would be valid if the Nazis didn't, you know, round up the socialists and put them in camps with other "enemies of the state".
 
The difference is the Communists are one with the modern Left... Nazi's... Leftist by their origination (National Socialists) have no ties to the Republican Party.

We don't support them, and share no common platform. That cannot be said about the communists... The modern Left embraces much of the ideology.

Mm-hmm...same crap that McCarthy was spewing back in the 1950's. It was silly and wildly inaccurate then...and it's silly and wildly inaccurate now.

What's more, you seem to be one of those that sees the word "socialism" and all you can think of is the USSR. You apparently haven't gotten the clue that there's many different types of socialism, and some types are very, very different from others. That said, America is already socialized to a significant extent, though not quite to the same extent as most other first-world democracies.

You're not going to rid America of socialism - it's already here, and it's been making the lives of Americans better ever since FDR first instituted Social Security about eighty years ago. If eighty years isn't enough for socialism to destroy a nation's economy - as y'all insist it must - then chances are REALLY good that the problems with our economy have nothing to do with socialism.

Of course, you could go look at the plethora of third-world democracies, most of whom have FAR less (and sometimes no) socialism in their economies...and yet they remain third-world economies.

So that begs the question why it is that in the past eighty years that America's had socialism as a very real part of its economy, that America's economy continued to grow and kick butt...but NONE of the nations that were not socialized to a great extent. Why is that?
 
Nazi's...(National Socialists)

They're fascists. That's pegged on the far right. Don't let yourself be fooled by a German to English translation of what they chose to call themselves.
 
Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot intervention was "bad" when the US did it. It's "good" when the Soviet Union is doing it, right?

What do you think? I'm curious. Would you place support of death squads in Latin America (granted it's not the FBI like in my previous post, thanks for derailing) on the same moral pedestal as providing material support to anti-apartheid groups?

If you don't get care so much, why not move to a communist country like China or North Korea? See how things really work there.

Communist countries, and I can't believe I have to repeat this ad nauseum, do not exist. Communism exists opposed to nation-states. Call them socialist if you want. And also no, I'm not leaving. Hope that chaps you someplace unpleasant

Sent from my 6045I using Tapatalk
 
What do you think? I'm curious. Would you place support of death squads in Latin America (granted it's not the FBI like in my previous post, thanks for derailing) on the same moral pedestal as providing material support to anti-apartheid groups?



Communist countries, and I can't believe I have to repeat this ad nauseum, do not exist. Communism exists opposed to nation-states. Call them socialist if you want. And also no, I'm not leaving. Hope that chaps you someplace unpleasant

Sent from my 6045I using Tapatalk

Which "anti-apartheid" groups in particular? The ones which tried to struggle peacefully, or the guerrillas who blew up innocent civilians?

The KGB could tell you all about death squads. Katyn Forest ring any bells?
 
Religions LOVE to inflate their numbers...and "Christians" are no exception. (and I put "Christian" in quote marks because the overwhelming majority of those who claim to be Christian, are not in fact Christian)

That said, there's about 244 million Buddhists in China.

*yawn*


WRONG..... christians are growing faster in china than america or europe and its the good kind ... the conservative christians THE PROTESTANT KIND
 
Nonsense, total and utter, nonsense. That the vote is changing has nothing to do with IQ but with the changing make up of the US population. Zimbabwe elected a semi dictator and as long as he is going to keep winning as long as he "corrupts" the population there. It has little to do with IQ but with greasing enough palms with loads of cash, land and power in order for him to win the election once again.

check the changing population to check how their IQ's are changing from the past


same harm will come like rhodesia to zimbabbwee
 
But the US is not Zimbabwe so that comparison is totally nonsensical.

And who decides what is a lower IQ? You, the senate? The president? Sorry, but your whole point of view makes no sense whatsoever.

the changing from higher IQ's voting to lower IQ's voting is EXACTLY like rhodesia to zimbabwee
 
check the changing population to check how their IQ's are changing from the past


same harm will come like rhodesia to zimbabbwee

Except that people are getting more intelligent and getting a higher IQ, especially the youth you at times denounce. So that blows your bogus assertions right out of the water (when it comes to elections in the pool of Western democracies).
 
the changing from higher IQ's voting to lower IQ's voting is EXACTLY like rhodesia to zimbabwee

Except that IQ and education is on the up, not going down.
 
Except that IQ and education is on the up, not going down.

NOPE.. education is going up because its a fraud.... giving points when not doing the work... and education is copying NOT true wisdom..... the change in IQ's can come from different TESTS or an increase in ones health..... IQ's does not change because of education...educations is simply copying and nothing to do with UNDERSTANDING.... INVENTING or PREDICTING which comes from the LOGIC part of the IQ.....
 
NOPE.. education is going up because its a fraud.... giving points when not doing the work... and education is copying NOT true wisdom..... the change in IQ's can come from different TESTS or an increase in ones health..... IQ's does not change because of education...educations is simply copying and nothing to do with UNDERSTANDING.... INVENTING or PREDICTING which comes from the LOGIC part of the IQ.....

Really, I don't know where you come up with your nonsense. And again, the United States is not Zimbabwe and also, it is a right to vote, not a conditional right based on your insane ideas about only allowing IQ's of a certain level to vote. Nice way to have a elites only electoral system.
 
Really, I don't know where you come up with your nonsense. And again, the United States is not Zimbabwe and also, it is a right to vote, not a conditional right based on your insane ideas about only allowing IQ's of a certain level to vote. Nice way to have a elites only electoral system.

AGAIN it is the lowering of voters IQ from higher IQ's that is the SAME and the SAME in electing crooks..... MUGABEE and Obama and both nations falling GDP scores
 
AGAIN it is the lowering of voters IQ from higher IQ's that is the SAME and the SAME in electing crooks..... MUGABEE and Obama and both nations falling GDP scores

Baseless nonsense, there is no evidence to even suggest this. All you do is repeat the same baseless insinuations and by the way it is Robert Mugabe and what does the GDP have to do with intelligence, and who says they are falling for the US?
 
Baseless nonsense, there is no evidence to even suggest this. All you do is repeat the same baseless insinuations and by the way it is Robert Mugabe and what does the GDP have to do with intelligence, and who says they are falling for the US?

check america's GDP scores in the 70's and 80's and compare to today

a lot of progress which is GDP scores comes from inventions and that takes logic
 
The humorous part of SailAway's rant is the constant reference of "GDP scores," which don't exactly exist.

If he's trying to say U.S. GDP is declining under Obama (thanks to the unwise or whatever the ****), and that GDP is falling in Europe because liberals, or what have you ...

US_GDP_29.01.2016-1.jpg
 
The U.S. economy expanded less than forecast in the second quarter after a weaker start to the year than previously estimated as companies slimmed down inventories and remained wary of investing amid shaky global demand.

Gross domestic product rose at a 1.2 percent annualized rate after a 0.8 percent advance the prior quarter, Commerce Department figures showed Friday in Washington. The median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg called for a 2.5 percent second-quarter increase.

The report raises the risk t

/////////////////////

compare that to china's 6.75% gain.. compare to early progress of america....... a gdp score of 1% is OUTRAGEOLUS
 
Neither Hillary or Trump can control who endorses them and who doesn't.

Liberals are retarded for thinking Trump affiliates himself with the KKK
Republicans are retarded for thinking Hillary affiliates herself with a Communist group.

You know...by law of deduction, somewhere in America there is the worst child molester. Whomever he votes for, do you really think the candidate endorses child molestation?
 
Back
Top Bottom