- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 31,645
- Reaction score
- 7,598
- Location
- Canada, Costa Rica
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
In other words, you're not going to look. And since one jackass who is the Communications Chair of Sacramento County Dems (in other words, a complete nobody) tweeted something terrible, that is incontrovertible evidence that Democrats are Awful People who are Always Worse Than Republicans, forever and ever.
Ted Nugent, a Republican who has a much higher profile than the CC, has said just as bad or worse. There.
More on Ted Nugent « The Reality-Based Community
Not a single person here has defended him. That said, he's the communications chair of the Sacramento County Democrats. WHO CARES. This guy is an absolute nobody, and people here are holding him up as prima facie evidence that Democrats are somehow worse than Republicans when it comes to awful rhetoric.
Not a single person here has defended him. That said, he's the communications chair of the Sacramento County Democrats. WHO CARES. This guy is an absolute nobody, and people here are holding him up as prima facie evidence that Democrats are somehow worse than Republicans when it comes to awful rhetoric.
I looked and saw nothing, If you have anything at all about Republicans or Republican commentators wishing people dead, or accusing others of wanting people dead, let's see it. If this is all you have then its nada.
Not my fault people ignored the topic, which was indeed what the communications chair of the Sac County Dems said. Who cares? I care, because it was a completely unacceptable thing for anyone to have said.
Not my fault that partisans on both sides either ducked the issue by not criticizing his terrible words, pretended that the "other side does it too", or decided to paint an entire political party with the potty mouth of a single man.
I don't play the partisan game. I call it as I see it, and am on record as calling out proponents of both parties when they lie, mislead, fabricate or state unsourced gossip as fact. This particular guy was a douchebag, so that's what I called him. :shrug:
Of course it was unacceptable; however, in the greater scheme of things, this guy has zero national profile. It's a non-story.
"Jerk Says Something Awful On Twitter: Film at 11."
Eh, I live fairly close to Sacramento so I was interested. For most people it was indeed a "non-story"... but amazingly, look how many folks had to jump in with their personal comments in a "non-story" thread anyway. Such is life on a political forum. :lol:
Vester: You say you'd rather not talk to liberals at all?
Coulter: I think a baseball bat is the most effective way these days.
We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens's creme brulee. That's just a joke, for you in the media. (ha ha, Ann)
Well of course, you can pretty much set your watch by that.
The implication (or flat-out claim) by some here is that awful rhetoric is the exclusive province of "the left," which is asinine.
We agree. Thing is almost nobody who entered this thread actually wanted to discuss the actual topic of the thread, and derailed it to suit themselves. The result is a quagmire flamefest complete with Mod Warning and most probably a few slapped wrists! I did respond to the actual topic of the thread, and was surprised when you set upon me!
I'm not annoyed or anything, because I actually do like you and think you're a good poster. However, you didn't respond to what I said; you responded to what everyone else had said. That is how miscommunications happen... although not in this case, because I'm awesomely cool and understanding. Also, I don't have a horse in this race! :lol:
I hope you don't think I was "setting upon" you; just clarifying that yes, while people were sidestepping and generally turning this into so much partisan fodder, nobody was actually defending this guy and, in the greater scheme of things, this guy isn't exactly a heavy hitter.
The truth is, no one is above it. The truth.....like I said what is the point? I do not mean that in a derisive or sarcastic way it is a real question. What do we do with that information?
I can see where trfjr is coming from. One dumb Republican chump uses a phrase like "legitimate rape" and it's a shiit-storm across every newspaper front page from coast to coast. A few Republicans have some polarizing views on reproductive rights, and suddenly all Republicans are "anti-female".
All people tend to paint with a pretty broad brush, but can you deny that the Democrats have been doing it much more often and vehemently as of late? Liberals have become the undisputed kings of assumption these days.
I question whether or not the citizens want it gone. For one thing there has been a very focused effort to confuse people about it and scare people about it. So even if that is accurate, most people don't want it, how do we assure ourselves that we are actually following an informed consensus?
so calling people who are liberal weak-minded and comparing them to followers of jim jones "classy"
well there are the ultrasounds.
Why is the democrat party trying to destroy opportunities for women and minorities?then why is the republican party ignoring the wage gap between men and women?
"Dems"? It's one guy. One seriously twisted guy, but one guy.
Here is the point I was trying to make. Not to be rude. But, seriously...what is the point of discovering who is the worst? What do we do once we uncover solid proof that is one side or the other?
If it were limited to an overemotional cry-fest limited to the threat of taking them away you might have a point, but try to do so much as limit the availability of 100round clips and they wet themselves. And not in a good way.
Here's how I view it - if you murder someone with an illegal gun, you should go to jail for the rest of your life. If you murder someone with a legal gun, you should go to jail for the rest of your life.
If you murder someone with a fully automatic street-sweeper, you should go to jail for the rest of your life. If you murder someone with a deer rifle, you should go to jail for the rest of your life.
Bottom line - punish the crime, not the tool. The only difference between killing someone in cold blood by a gun and by your bare hands is opportunity. The crime is exactly the same otherwise.
I hear you and don't disagree with the fact that regardless of how you do it the victim is still dead and dead is the same no matter how you got there.
However,
1)it is much easier to kill someone with a gun: victim has less of a chance of getting away, more likely to happen in the heat of the moment because a gun was accessible, more likely to end up dead (wound more lethal) ...
2)you can kill them from a distance: it detaches you from the reality of what you are doing
The first thing we need to do to address mass killings is change how we treat mental illness in this country. (I think everyone can agree with that) Men especially are ashamed to get the help they need and it is a waste of life not only for the victims if he loses it, but for him (because its always some crazy dude). Some people need to have their rights infringed on because they are not competent enough to handle them (especially that one) in a way that does not endanger others. The question is how do you weed them out?
its time republicans take the gloves off and stop playing the gentleman sport of politics they have been trying to play for years. it is time to go bare fisted and start fighting just like the left if they expect to win anything. you cant fight a fair fight and win if your opponent refuses to do the same
More CONfusion on the radical right... the gloves came off with those Willie Horton ads back when BushI ran for president.
Seems to me the communications director is a far cry from someone running for Congress or a recovering drug addict going on national radio to call a college co-ed- slut, demanding to tape her sexual activity because she wants her Insurance Company to put birth control in the coverage.
Problem with the CON game is they try and make every bad act equal, and ignore their over the top buffoons all the while declaring the 'gloves need to come off' when going dirty- (anyone who has actually done any work that gets your hands dirty knows you put gloves ON) :roll:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?