FBI, DOJ roiled by Comey, Lynch decision to let Clinton slide by on emails, says insider | Fox News
career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged.
No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been verified by FoxNews.com
A high-ranking FBI official told Fox News that while it might not have been a unanimous decision, “It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.
The corruption at the white house level and the DOJ and the FBI is amazing. the fact that no one can do anything about it is what stymies me.
surely there is someone out there that can file a suit and go after her and have her arrested.
Imo a deal should of been cut. They should of forced her not to run in exchange for not prosecuting. Omally would not been a bad nominee and the nation would be spared the shame she threatens to bring to the white house.FBI, DOJ roiled by Comey, Lynch decision to let Clinton slide by on emails, says insider | Fox News
career agents and attorneys on the case unanimously believed the Democratic presidential nominee should have been charged.
No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute -- it was a top-down decision,” said the source, whose identity and role in the case has been verified by FoxNews.com
A high-ranking FBI official told Fox News that while it might not have been a unanimous decision, “It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton’s] security clearance yanked.
The corruption at the white house level and the DOJ and the FBI is amazing. the fact that no one can do anything about it is what stymies me.
surely there is someone out there that can file a suit and go after her and have her arrested.
There is no question that her negligient handling of Classified material should have resulted in her losing her security clearance. It happens to less political servicemen and women all the time.
Given that when I debate people on this it leads to "the entire Justice Department is corrupt" I see no avenue for a rational discussion. When it is all said and done, no confidential information was compromised and America's interests were not affected. This has nothing to do with any harm that was caused and everything to do with a witch hunt because some people feel Clinton got special treatment. If that is the case then it is systemic, but aside from a personal desire to see Clinton in jail, I doubt anyone really cares. It will stop being an issue as soon as she is elected, because right now it is being used as an election issue but when it can no longer be used as such, people will go back to not caring about it.
Then you should support changing the laws as they regard the handling of sensitive material. After all, I cant imagine you want a low level employee facing charges while the rich and powerful are untouched. The law, to be just, must apply to all people equally. If people have been or are being prosecuted or facing some form of discipline for doing far less than she admits to doing, then those people should be given a pass as well. Even Comey said that his refusal to recommend prosecution should not be seen by others as a free pass to engage in similar activity. Imagine if some low level, pencil pusher at the Pentagon used a home server to communicate sensitive material. Do you think the FBI would give them a pass as well?
As I said, you and nobody else will probably care after the election. That is the only reason that this is an issue. If I see a push from the public for changes to the Justice Department to hold higher ups more accountable after the election then I will sincerely apologize, but it will not happen.
Then you should support changing the laws as they regard the handling of sensitive material. After all, I cant imagine you want a low level employee facing charges while the rich and powerful are untouched. The law, to be just, must apply to all people equally. If people have been or are being prosecuted or facing some form of discipline for doing far less than she admits to doing, then those people should be given a pass as well. Even Comey said that his refusal to recommend prosecution should not be seen by others as a free pass to engage in similar activity. Imagine if some low level, pencil pusher at the Pentagon used a home server to communicate sensitive material. Do you think the FBI would give them a pass as well?
Given that when I debate people on this it leads to "the entire Justice Department is corrupt" I see no avenue for a rational discussion. When it is all said and done, no confidential information was compromised and America's interests were not affected. This has nothing to do with any harm that was caused and everything to do with a witch hunt because some people feel Clinton got special treatment. If that is the case then it is systemic, but aside from a personal desire to see Clinton in jail, I doubt anyone really cares. It will stop being an issue as soon as she is elected, because right now it is being used as an election issue but when it can no longer be used as such, people will go back to not caring about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?