- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
- Messages
- 37,148
- Reaction score
- 7,716
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
The City of Longmont (where i live) has offered a municipal utility fiber optic internet service called Nextlight, more info here.
I had nextlight installed today and ran a side-to-side comparison, here is the result :
Public sector 1, private industry 0.
The City of Longmont (where i live) has offered a municipal utility fiber optic internet service called Nextlight, more info here.
I had nextlight installed today and ran a side-to-side comparison, here is the result :
![]()
Public sector 1, private industry 0.
The City of Longmont (where i live) has offered a municipal utility fiber optic internet service called Nextlight, more info here.
I had nextlight installed today and ran a side-to-side comparison, here is the result :
![]()
Public sector 1, private industry 0.
The City of Longmont (where i live) has offered a municipal utility fiber optic internet service called Nextlight, more info here.
I had nextlight installed today and ran a side-to-side comparison, here is the result :
![]()
Public sector 1, private industry 0.
comcast charges you $ 93 a mo for just internet usage?
Smokin but, why do you need that much?
Your comparing fiber optics to a copper cable. A bit disingenuous don't you think? Why not compare fiber to fiber?
Comcast is probably too cheap and/or lazy to install it most likely.
That still doesn't make it a fair comparison. It is like pointing out that a Porsche 911 is faster than Ford Escape.
Because why not?
Unless you have a super PC it's broadband overload.
Smokin but, why do you need that much?
Wait until Nextlight has the same traffic.
comcast charges you $ 93 a mo for just internet usage?
Your comparing fiber optics to a copper cable. A bit disingenuous don't you think? Why not compare fiber to fiber?
That still doesn't make it a fair comparison. It is like pointing out that a Porsche 911 is faster than Ford Escape.
Unless you have a super PC it's broadband overload.
If your suggestion is that coax is worse, then shouldn't the price reflect that ?
You're ignoring that tax money is almost certainly covering at least some of the costs. It isn't cheaper, you're just not seeing the rest of the money they're taking out of your pocket.
Bonds cover the investments but not the costs.
On the one hand, the $50/mo is a charter member only price meaning that you have to sign up in the first 3 months of availability in order to latch in that price. The standard price for the 1Gbps service is $100/mo, while 25Mbps is available for $40/mo. Note that this charter member price is transferable to both your new address (if you move) and to those who bought your old house. It is subject to possible rate increases in the future but those rate increases must be due to cost increases because it is a utility, not a for-profit.
On the other hand, from the FAQ:
"1. How much tax money is being spent on NextLight?
None. Funding for Longmont Power & Communications comes from a city enterprise fund, meaning that LPC utilities each support themselves through the electric and broadband rates collected. By leveraging our excellent electric utility, we were able to obtain favorable interest rates for NextLight’s $40.3 million bond issue, reducing the overall cost of building the system. As with LPC’s electric utility, NextLight is expected to pay its own way through its own revenues."
Which still means they are using funding methods not available to private companies, plus they are getting special rates that private companies simply cannot get. So it's not a fair comparison, no matter how you look at it.