• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Colin Powell Says he was fired

  • Thread starter Thread starter hipsterdufus
  • Start date Start date
H

hipsterdufus

Sorry, no link, but MSNBC is reporting that Colin Powell's new book states that he was fired by the Bushies.

I always thought Powell was one of the few people in the inner circle of the administration that had some common sense, no wonder he got canned.
 
hipsterdufus said:
Sorry, no link, but MSNBC is reporting that Colin Powell's new book states that he was fired by the Bushies.

I always thought Powell was one of the few people in the inner circle of the administration that had some common sense, no wonder he got canned.
Common sense and a helluva lot more knowledge then the rest of Bush's administration.
 
hipsterdufus said:
Sorry, no link, but MSNBC is reporting that Colin Powell's new book states that he was fired by the Bushies.

I always thought Powell was one of the few people in the inner circle of the administration that had some common sense, no wonder he got canned.

There's an article about it in the Washington Post magazine from this weekend. I'll read it and report my findings.
 
hipsterdufus said:
Sorry, no link, but MSNBC is reporting that Colin Powell's new book states that he was fired by the Bushies.

I always thought Powell was one of the few people in the inner circle of the administration that had some common sense, no wonder he got canned.

So, is he lying now, or was he lying in 2004 when he said he was not fired?
 
Here's the article from the Washington Post:

"The president would like to make a change," (Chief of Staff) Card said, using a time-honored formulation that avoided the words "resign" or "fire." He noted briskly that there had been some discussion of having Powell remain until after Iraqi elections scheduled for the end of January, but that the president had decided to take care of all Cabinet changes sooner rather than later. Bush wanted Powell's resignation letter dated two days hence, on Friday, November 12, Card said, although the White House expected him to stay at the State Department until his successor was confirmed by the Senate.

The president himself made no contact with Powell after Card's call. For two days, the only person at the State Department Powell told about it was his deputy and friend of decades, Richard Armitage. Powell dropped off his resignation letter, as instructed, after typing it himself on his home computer. (The White House later pointed out a typo and sent it back to be redone.) Loath to reveal either surprise or insult, he used the letter to claim the decision to leave as his own.

"Dear Mr. President:" he wrote. "As we have discussed in recent months, I believe that now that the election is over the time has come for me to step down as Secretary of State . . . effective at your pleasure."

It sounds like he was prompted to leave so both sides save face, but looking at the article, it sounded like Powell didn't have much interest in staying for the second term anyway. So much ado about nothing, it would seem.
 
It would appear that Bush is unused to having people around him who are sane and able to give constructive advice.

It seems that they have to agree with him or they are gone.
 
Goobieman said:
So, is he lying now, or was he lying in 2004 when he said he was not fired?

You calling Andrew Card a lying Liberal now? :rofl
 
Back
Top Bottom