You often toss out comments like this with no sources. When I have requested your sources in the past, you've commented that you keep your own personal polling charts or data - by combining those made public.
I went to RCP and to 538 and did a google search - and can see no polling on the November PA matchup yet. I only see polling on the primary, in which Fetterman and McCormick are leading for their respective parties. So, what leads you to the conclusion that Fetterman has a November advantage?
The only available data I can find, as yet, regarding the November PA senate election is in the betting markets. Here is a three month chart of that race and it's remained quite consistent for 2 months.
Again, please tell me what data leads you to the conclusion that Fetterman has a slight advantage against his potential Republican candidate (looking like McCormick so far)?
I love to talk about upcoming elections and I know you do too. But, when either of us toss out more than guesses, don't you think sources are in order? Without sources, they're just guesses and I like guesses to - but they should be identified as guesses or opinions - would you agree?
View attachment 67384002