• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

CNN covers 9/11 conspiracy film 'Loose Change' (1 Viewer)

danarhea

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,256
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
"Loose Change" is a film which presents a lot of facts, and comes to the conclusion that our own government planned and executed the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Personally, I strongly believe their conclusion to be way off base. The only way for this conclusion to have a single iota of credence is if there was a conspiracy by thousands of people to cover up government involvement in 911. Statistically, this is an impossibility. bin Laden & Company are responsible for 911, not the US government. There was no American Reichstag. Period. The evidence supporting this is overwhelming to the point of absolute certainty.

However, the film "Loose Change" does bring up a lot of very interesting facts, and that is what is making this movie popular. Here is one fact - How could an entire 757 disappear into a 16 foot hole in the Pentagon without leaving a lot of wreckage outside? The windows on either side of the hole were unbroken. The wingspan of a 757 is more than 140 feet. There are many more interesting questions which lead me to conclude that we have not been told everything about what really happened on 911. Still, this does not mean the government attacked its own people. What does it mean? I dont know. Does anyone else have any ideas?

There have been more than 10 million downloads of this film since it was released. People want to know, and now that the mediawhores are involved in its coverage, interest in "Loose Change" can only increase.

Article is here.

Movie "Loose Change" is here.
 
Last edited:
There was a test done a while back in the mid to late 1990's with a fighter jet. During the test, the fighter drone was flown at about 400 mph into a solid wall.

The resulting impact reduced the fighter to confetti. This is most likely what happened with the 757 as well.
 
SixStringHero said:
There was a test done a while back in the mid to late 1990's with a fighter jet. During the test, the fighter drone was flown at about 400 mph into a solid wall.

The resulting impact reduced the fighter to confetti. This is most likely what happened with the 757 as well.
Click to expand...

Actually, it did not reduce the engines to confetti. They remained intact, although badly battered, due to the fact that they were made of titanium.

Which brings me to this point. why no marks on the building from the engines? Why were the windows on each side of the 16 foot hole still unbroken?

Again, these are good questions to ask for an answer to. No, I am not saying that our own government conspired to kill its own citizens. They did not do that. All I am saying is that there are a heap of unanswered questions which need to be answered. As an American, I believe I am entitled to know. The government is not our master. It serves at the pleasure of the American people. We are the boss, not the politicians who run this nation. If America was run like a corporaton, 90% of our politicans would have been fired long ago, and that includes this incompetent administration.
 
Harshaw said:
And here, the snotnosed arrogant kids who made it go face to face with Popular Mechanics, who debunked 9/11 conspiracy theories.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-901683049872134071&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=undefined

They do not come off well. One of the first things the "researcher" for LC does is smugly accuse PM of being part of the conspiracy because because it's a Hearst magazine. (?)
Click to expand...

Wow they got their asses handed to them and that stupid little **** had the audacity to call one of the PM guys a yellow journalist when infact loosechange is yellow journalism to the nth degree.

Loosechange is the most fallacy laden piece of tripe I've ever had the disprevlige of watching and to start of the debate the producer of the film starts right off with an ad-hominem.
 
I wonder, is 'Loose Change' available on DVD?

Anyone?
 
There is a website that has Photos of chuncks of 747 engine laying in and outside the pentagon, along with a lot of other parts, a diagram of the lights in the parking lot that got taken down by the plane, and the physics behind it, and damned if i cant find it, ill get it though, it seemed pretty credible.
 
This video is the best argument against universal suffrage I've ever seen.
 
Here's a VERY thorough guide to Loose Change 2nd Edition:

http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

It exposes LC as amateur propaganda. The sad part is that so many people (especially young people) fall hook, line, and sinker for this crap. Last week, several people promoted it by writing about it with chalk on my college campus. Sickening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom